On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:40PM -0500, Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II wrote:
> Is anyone working on 3.3.6 in woody?
Yeah, me. I just uploaded 3.3.6-20 yesterday.
--
G. Branden Robinson | If you have the slightest bit of
Debian GNU/Linux| intellectual inte
Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2000 22:06 schrieb Seth Arnold:
> God, I would love to know how the rest of the four billion people on the
> planet cope with their own character set. It would be nice to help him
> out, but someone else is going to have to do it. :(
>
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTEC
- Forwarded message from Raphaël HALIMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Raphaël HALIMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with your Debian packages
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:24:27 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAI
In case noone noticed, we already kind of solved his problem yesterday. :)
Anyway...
Michael Meding wrote:
> I guess there is a broken symlink somewhere in your system. I once had this
> also. But I don't recall how to correct this.
Interesting idea. I remember someone talking about the xkb fi
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 10:48:13PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 22:43]:
> > Let me know if this works out, and I will babysit XFree86 builds for m68k
> > myself, using the recently-donated G3.
>
> Well, I wasn't thinking of emulating one of those old m
Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2000 17:22 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> In case noone noticed, we already kind of solved his problem yesterday. :)
>
> Anyway...
>
> Michael Meding wrote:
> > I guess there is a broken symlink somewhere in your system. I once had
> > this also. But I don't recall how to correct
On my X workstation, there are currently 3 Xaw packages installed for
a small selection of Athena apps (all from Debian): libxaw6, libxaw7,
and xaw3dg. Oh yeah, and xaw-wrappers. The dependencies seem to be a
huge mess: most old X packages depend indirectly on libxaw6, the more
recently compiled on
Hello, just got this error:
Setting up xutils (4.0.1-12) ...
ERROR: /usr/bin/rstartd symbolic link does not exist.
Either the package didn't ship the symbolic link (a bug in the package),
or dpkg failed to unpack it to the filesystem (a bug in dpkg).
Please report the package name, version, and t
Hi Aaron :-)
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:38:56AM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On my X workstation, there are currently 3 Xaw packages installed for
> a small selection of Athena apps (all from Debian): libxaw6, libxaw7,
> and xaw3dg. Oh yeah, and xaw-wrappers. The dependencies seem to be a
[snip]
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:45:45PM +, Lysander wrote:
> Hello, just got this error:
>
>
> Setting up xutils (4.0.1-12) ...
> ERROR: /usr/bin/rstartd symbolic link does not exist.
> Either the package didn't ship the symbolic link (a bug in the package),
> or dpkg failed to unpack it to the fi
HST> As for why some packages explicitly depends on xaw3dg, it just
HST> shows that Xaw3d and plain Xaw are not 100% compatible -- see gv,
HST> for example. I'm not sure if gv is exactly *dependent* on
HST> xaw3d-specific features; maybe it is.
I believe that there is a problem with applications t
Hi there, I found a patch to correct the X 4.0.1 nv driver when used
with Riva 128... it'd be nice if it could be incorporated as a Debian
patch, given the X developers aren't willing to help on this at all,
even if it's really a little bug
http://www.iit.uni-miskolc.hu/~halasz3/linux/xpatch.html
- Forwarded message from "Antonio M. D'souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Antonio M. D'souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dpkg having serious trouble trying to upgrade xlibs
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:20:50 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL P
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:47:17PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:39:55PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > xserver-xfree86-11 gives corruption on my V3 3000. Black bars run across
> > the top of the screen, and moving windows causes corruption. I'm running at
> > 1792
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:39:50PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:47:17PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:39:55PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > xserver-xfree86-11 gives corruption on my V3 3000. Black bars run across
> > > the top of
Hi all, i recently was finally able to get my laptop and network
connection debian-ized but when i try to install task-x-window
and startx debvonf,
i get an x-window briefly and then it says
:Cant open card database?
ideas?
thanks
Forwarded From: Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am forwarding this XFree86 Bug Report to this list mostly for posterity,
since I truly believe that this is an XFree86 bug. If, however, someone on
this list may provide some advice, I'd be more than happy to hear it. What
follows is one of th
Hi,
I noticed today that xserver-xfree86 fails to configure if gcc is not
installed, this appears to be due to the use of dpkg --print-architecture:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --print-architecture
i386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg --remove gcc
(Reading database ... 11128 files and directories c
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:22:07PM +, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> I noticed today that xserver-xfree86 fails to configure if gcc is not
> installed, this appears to be due to the use of dpkg --print-architecture:
[...]
> I think dpkg --print-installation-architecture should be used instead:
Fixed
Hallo,
I guess you have followed the warnings during an previous install of the
XF4.01-deb's.
Don't, i repeat, don't make a symbolic link (ignore the warnings during
an install) from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults to
etc/X11/app-defaults.
In this trap i got in, short time ago (The trap snaps if
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:38:30AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> compress the tarball, and file a bug report with important severity so I
>
> Yes, this is one of the few things I give people permission to file
> release-critical bugs against for. :)
The important severity is no longer release
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 12:18:01AM +0100, reiner wrote:
> Don't, i repeat, don't make a symbolic link (ignore the warnings during
> an install) from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults to
> etc/X11/app-defaults.
You have to be more specific. On my systems, both current woody and potato
with the potat
Hallo,
If you have a symlink from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults to
etc/X11/app-defaults, then remove this symlink and try the install
again.
This has worked for me.
See the post (problem with your Debian packages) on the list
Good Luck
Reiner Stallknecht
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:40PM -0500, Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II wrote:
> Is anyone working on 3.3.6 in woody?
Yeah, me. I just uploaded 3.3.6-20 yesterday.
--
G. Branden Robinson | If you have the slightest bit of
Debian GNU/Linux| intellectual int
Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2000 22:06 schrieb Seth Arnold:
> God, I would love to know how the rest of the four billion people on the
> planet cope with their own character set. It would be nice to help him
> out, but someone else is going to have to do it. :(
>
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTE
- Forwarded message from Raphaël HALIMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Raphaël HALIMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with your Debian packages
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:24:27 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMA
In case noone noticed, we already kind of solved his problem yesterday. :)
Anyway...
Michael Meding wrote:
> I guess there is a broken symlink somewhere in your system. I once had this
> also. But I don't recall how to correct this.
Interesting idea. I remember someone talking about the xkb f
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 10:48:13PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 22:43]:
> > Let me know if this works out, and I will babysit XFree86 builds for m68k
> > myself, using the recently-donated G3.
>
> Well, I wasn't thinking of emulating one of those old
Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2000 17:22 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> In case noone noticed, we already kind of solved his problem yesterday. :)
>
> Anyway...
>
> Michael Meding wrote:
> > I guess there is a broken symlink somewhere in your system. I once had
> > this also. But I don't recall how to correc
On my X workstation, there are currently 3 Xaw packages installed for
a small selection of Athena apps (all from Debian): libxaw6, libxaw7,
and xaw3dg. Oh yeah, and xaw-wrappers. The dependencies seem to be a
huge mess: most old X packages depend indirectly on libxaw6, the more
recently compiled o
Hello, just got this error:
Setting up xutils (4.0.1-12) ...
ERROR: /usr/bin/rstartd symbolic link does not exist.
Either the package didn't ship the symbolic link (a bug in the package),
or dpkg failed to unpack it to the filesystem (a bug in dpkg).
Please report the package name, version, and
Hi Aaron :-)
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:38:56AM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On my X workstation, there are currently 3 Xaw packages installed for
> a small selection of Athena apps (all from Debian): libxaw6, libxaw7,
> and xaw3dg. Oh yeah, and xaw-wrappers. The dependencies seem to be a
[snip]
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:45:45PM +, Lysander wrote:
> Hello, just got this error:
>
>
> Setting up xutils (4.0.1-12) ...
> ERROR: /usr/bin/rstartd symbolic link does not exist.
> Either the package didn't ship the symbolic link (a bug in the package),
> or dpkg failed to unpack it to the f
HST> As for why some packages explicitly depends on xaw3dg, it just
HST> shows that Xaw3d and plain Xaw are not 100% compatible -- see gv,
HST> for example. I'm not sure if gv is exactly *dependent* on
HST> xaw3d-specific features; maybe it is.
I believe that there is a problem with applications
Hi there, I found a patch to correct the X 4.0.1 nv driver when used
with Riva 128... it'd be nice if it could be incorporated as a Debian
patch, given the X developers aren't willing to help on this at all,
even if it's really a little bug
http://www.iit.uni-miskolc.hu/~halasz3/linux/xpatch.html
- Forwarded message from "Antonio M. D'souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
From: "Antonio M. D'souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dpkg having serious trouble trying to upgrade xlibs
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:20:50 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:47:17PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:39:55PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > xserver-xfree86-11 gives corruption on my V3 3000. Black bars run across
> > the top of the screen, and moving windows causes corruption. I'm running at
> > 179
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:39:50PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:47:17PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:39:55PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > xserver-xfree86-11 gives corruption on my V3 3000. Black bars run across
> > > the top of
Hi all, i recently was finally able to get my laptop and network
connection debian-ized but when i try to install task-x-window
and startx debvonf,
i get an x-window briefly and then it says
:Cant open card database?
ideas?
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Forwarded From: Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am forwarding this XFree86 Bug Report to this list mostly for posterity,
since I truly believe that this is an XFree86 bug. If, however, someone on
this list may provide some advice, I'd be more than happy to hear it. What
follows is one of t
Hi,
I noticed today that xserver-xfree86 fails to configure if gcc is not
installed, this appears to be due to the use of dpkg --print-architecture:
malcolm@arthur:~$ dpkg --print-architecture
i386
malcolm@arthur:~$ sudo dpkg --remove gcc
(Reading database ... 11128 files and directories curren
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:22:07PM +, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> I noticed today that xserver-xfree86 fails to configure if gcc is not
> installed, this appears to be due to the use of dpkg --print-architecture:
[...]
> I think dpkg --print-installation-architecture should be used instead:
Fixe
Hallo,
I guess you have followed the warnings during an previous install of the
XF4.01-deb's.
Don't, i repeat, don't make a symbolic link (ignore the warnings during
an install) from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults to
etc/X11/app-defaults.
In this trap i got in, short time ago (The trap snaps if
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:38:30AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> compress the tarball, and file a bug report with important severity so I
>
> Yes, this is one of the few things I give people permission to file
> release-critical bugs against for. :)
The important severity is no longer releas
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 12:18:01AM +0100, reiner wrote:
> Don't, i repeat, don't make a symbolic link (ignore the warnings during
> an install) from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults to
> etc/X11/app-defaults.
You have to be more specific. On my systems, both current woody and potato
with the pota
Hallo,
If you have a symlink from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults to
etc/X11/app-defaults, then remove this symlink and try the install
again.
This has worked for me.
See the post (problem with your Debian packages) on the list
Good Luck
Reiner Stallknecht
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
46 matches
Mail list logo
