On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:53:52PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> God only knows what int10
It is used for 'softbooting' video cards, basicly reiniting.
Very likely used for your second head.
> and record
Hell if I know.
> does. I also probably don't need
> some of these (actually, glx/dri doesn't
>> "Zephaniah E. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > and record
>
> Hell if I know.
That's the record extension, used to record and playback events (device
events and device events consequences) as well as events from arbitrary
X extensions. I think the GNOME people have an application
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:11:41PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Led to a case where 401f.diff could not be applied to the unpacked sources
> of XFree86. I've been told that sometimes this happens, because when you
> have a large volume of changes, and RCS version numbers hopping around,
> the
Guess I'm violating the license on this mail by forwarding it. Maybe Craig
Sanders and this guy would like to file a class-action copyright
infringment suit against me...
- Forwarded message from "Wyss, Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Wyss, Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTE
Goodness; what a horrible .signature. That would be a real incentive for
me to find a different employer. :) [Branden: it isn't Craig that you
need to worry about -- it is RMS! :]
In the meantime Otto, check your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file for a
fontpath element that is a unix-domain socket, p
- Forwarded message from Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#68389: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#68389 acknowledged by developer
(fixed with -7)]
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:24:3
Nathaniel, you are right -- reporting a bug against -10 and hearing it
is fixed in -7 is a little strange.
WRT your error message, I have approached similar problems in the past
by using dpkg directly on the apt-downloaded .deb packages, using the
--force-overwrite option. The problem isn't the ac
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:49:57AM +0100, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> is there any documentation how to upgrade from
> a 3.3.6 Server to the 4.x server?
apt-get install xserver-xfree86
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux| Never attribute to malice that which can
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:53:52PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> God only knows what int10 and record does. I also probably don't need
> some of these (actually, glx/dri doesn't work in my current dual-head
> setup, so removing those might actually help! :) -- but what the hey,
> it mostly works grea
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:59:00AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Goodness; what a horrible .signature. That would be a real incentive for
> me to find a different employer. :) [Branden: it isn't Craig that you
> need to worry about -- it is RMS! :]
You appear to be blissfully ignorant of certain fla
> > Goodness; what a horrible .signature. That would be a real incentive for
> > me to find a different employer. :) [Branden: it isn't Craig that you
> >
Sorry if I had known, that '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' gets relayed to
debian-x, I wouldn't have sent it. Usually I send everything first at my
home add
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:59:19PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > > Goodness; what a horrible .signature. That would be a real incentive for
> > > me to find a different employer. :) [Branden: it isn't Craig that you
> > >
> Sorry if I had known, that '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' gets relayed to
> debian-x, I
* Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001130 15:11]:
> Sorry if I had known, that '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' gets relayed to
> debian-x, I wouldn't have sent it. Usually I send everything first at my
> home address and than out to the world.
Well, Branden forwards email sent to his own account to debian-x if
I happen to work at Credit Suisse. If you'd like, I'll talk to him.
- Original Message -
From: "Branden Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 4:47 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: XFree 4.0.1-8 crashes my system completly, how
can I retrieve inf ormation fora
* Rounds Nathaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001130 16:38]:
> I don't know if you have access to the original bug report, but I tried
Heh, the wonderful thing about debian is that the bug reports are all
available via a filesystem rather than through CGI business. So, all the
debian bug reports get ind
Oh man, we have two very different ideas of systems. I felt slink was
far too old to bother with when I was running potato, and if someone
asked me to go back to potato today, I would be driven up the wall. :)
I don't know why your report was closed. My guess is, whoever closed it
simply raced thr
>> "Zephaniah E. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > and record
>
> Hell if I know.
That's the record extension, used to record and playback events (device
events and device events consequences) as well as events from arbitrary
X extensions. I think the GNOME people have an application
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:11:41PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Led to a case where 401f.diff could not be applied to the unpacked sources
> of XFree86. I've been told that sometimes this happens, because when you
> have a large volume of changes, and RCS version numbers hopping around,
> th
Guess I'm violating the license on this mail by forwarding it. Maybe Craig
Sanders and this guy would like to file a class-action copyright
infringment suit against me...
- Forwarded message from "Wyss, Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Wyss, Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROT
Goodness; what a horrible .signature. That would be a real incentive for
me to find a different employer. :) [Branden: it isn't Craig that you
need to worry about -- it is RMS! :]
In the meantime Otto, check your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file for a
fontpath element that is a unix-domain socket,
- Forwarded message from Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#68389: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#68389 acknowledged by developer
(fixed with -7)]
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:24
Nathaniel, you are right -- reporting a bug against -10 and hearing it
is fixed in -7 is a little strange.
WRT your error message, I have approached similar problems in the past
by using dpkg directly on the apt-downloaded .deb packages, using the
--force-overwrite option. The problem isn't the a
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:49:57AM +0100, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> is there any documentation how to upgrade from
> a 3.3.6 Server to the 4.x server?
apt-get install xserver-xfree86
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux| Never attribute to malice that which ca
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:53:52PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> God only knows what int10 and record does. I also probably don't need
> some of these (actually, glx/dri doesn't work in my current dual-head
> setup, so removing those might actually help! :) -- but what the hey,
> it mostly works gre
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:59:00AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Goodness; what a horrible .signature. That would be a real incentive for
> me to find a different employer. :) [Branden: it isn't Craig that you
> need to worry about -- it is RMS! :]
You appear to be blissfully ignorant of certain fl
> > Goodness; what a horrible .signature. That would be a real incentive for
> > me to find a different employer. :) [Branden: it isn't Craig that you
> >
Sorry if I had known, that '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' gets relayed to
debian-x, I wouldn't have sent it. Usually I send everything first at my
home ad
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:59:19PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > > Goodness; what a horrible .signature. That would be a real incentive for
> > > me to find a different employer. :) [Branden: it isn't Craig that you
> > >
> Sorry if I had known, that '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' gets relayed to
> debian-x, I
* Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001130 15:11]:
> Sorry if I had known, that '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' gets relayed to
> debian-x, I wouldn't have sent it. Usually I send everything first at my
> home address and than out to the world.
Well, Branden forwards email sent to his own account to debian-x if
I happen to work at Credit Suisse. If you'd like, I'll talk to him.
- Original Message -
From: "Branden Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 4:47 AM
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: XFree 4.0.1-8 crashes my system completly, how
can I retri
* Rounds Nathaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001130 16:38]:
> I don't know if you have access to the original bug report, but I tried
Heh, the wonderful thing about debian is that the bug reports are all
available via a filesystem rather than through CGI business. So, all the
debian bug reports get in
Oh man, we have two very different ideas of systems. I felt slink was
far too old to bother with when I was running potato, and if someone
asked me to go back to potato today, I would be driven up the wall. :)
I don't know why your report was closed. My guess is, whoever closed it
simply raced th
31 matches
Mail list logo
