49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Hi, I was trying to build the latest x4.0 on m68k. I could not unpack because the orig.tar.gz file has a different size than the previous version. Looking at an ftp mirror I see that orig.tar.gz also has the date of the dsc and diff files. Was that done intentional? I thought orig.tar.gz was upload

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:29:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > diff files. Was that done intentional? I thought orig.tar.gz was uploaded > only once for every upstream version? I do not want to download 50MB for > every test build if 4MB are enough... Branden's X 4.0.1 packages are track

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:28:59PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:29:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > diff files. Was that done intentional? I thought orig.tar.gz was uploaded > > only once for every upstream version? I do not want to download 50MB for > > eve

"slow" xdm startup

2000-11-29 Thread Jens Thiele
xdm startup takes 1-2minutes with 100% cpu strace shows that xdm is reading from /dev/urandom again and again: read(4, "V>\24\243B2B\330\346\24\215\322\202\277\276\340\275^\264"..., 8192) = 8192 read(4, "ES}\310\16\220\\\322\265(i\365\233t\3243\205uj\356\307"..., 8192) = 8192 read(4, "\230\16\26\3

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Torbjörn Andersson
Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I was trying to build the latest x4.0 on m68k. I could not unpack because > the orig.tar.gz file has a different size than the previous version. Looking > at an ftp mirror I see that orig.tar.gz also has the date of the dsc and > diff files. Was that done intentional

Re: "slow" xdm startup

2000-11-29 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 03:23:07PM +0100, Jens Thiele wrote: > xdm startup takes 1-2minutes with 100% cpu > strace shows that xdm is reading from /dev/urandom again and again: Hmmm, strange. FWIW, on my potato machine (2.2.17, promise pdc202xx.c patches only) I don't have this problem with the -8

Re: Bug#78254 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#78254: xkb definition files should be locate on /usr subdirectory)

2000-11-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 06:39:50PM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:46:58PM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > > I would say that /etc/X11/xkb is not the best place for these files. > > > > Upstream disagrees. > > > > Hi > > May I know who is the "Upstream" ?? The XFre

[carlos@fisica.ufpr.br: info on 3.3.6 -> 4]

2000-11-29 Thread Branden Robinson
The short answer is yes. You just upgrade everything except xserver-*. - Forwarded message from Carlos Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Carlos Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: info on 3.3.6 -> 4 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 07:59:29 -0200 Deliv

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 08:18:13AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:28:59PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:29:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > diff files. Was that done intentional? I thought orig.tar.gz was uploaded > > > o

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 03:31:06PM +0100, Torbjörn Andersson wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > I was trying to build the latest x4.0 on m68k. I could not unpack because > > the orig.tar.gz file has a different size than the previous version. Looking > > at an ftp mirror I see that orig.t

upgrading to the X4 server

2000-11-29 Thread Johannes Zellner
Hi, is there any documentation how to upgrade from a 3.3.6 Server to the 4.x server? -- Johannes

X 4 & xf86cfg

2000-11-29 Thread Johannes Zellner
Hello, wow, my X4 is already running. But when I try to use xf86cfg I get a message: Cannot open Cards database. what am I missing? -- Johannes

modules for the X 4.x server

2000-11-29 Thread Johannes Zellner
Hello, is there a location where I can find information about all the modules which are coming with the new X Server ? -- Johannes

Re: upgrading to the X4 server

2000-11-29 Thread Seth Arnold
* Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001129 16:55]: > is there any documentation how to upgrade from > a 3.3.6 Server to the 4.x server? No, I don't think there is. However, this might help you: (And no, I don't know why I installed the proxy, frame buffer deal, nested X server, or what uses th

Re: X 4 & xf86cfg

2000-11-29 Thread Seth Arnold
* Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001129 18:14]: > wow, my X4 is already running. But when I try to use > xf86cfg I get a message: > > Cannot open Cards database. > > what am I missing? Line 164 in changelog.Debian.gz for xfree86-common: * debian/xserver-xfree86.*: stop shipping xf

Re: modules for the X 4.x server

2000-11-29 Thread Seth Arnold
* Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001129 18:19]: > is there a location where I can find information about > all the modules which are coming with the new X Server ? Short of the source, I think my XF86Config-4 file is the closest thing around. :) $ cat /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 | grep -i load

49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Hi, I was trying to build the latest x4.0 on m68k. I could not unpack because the orig.tar.gz file has a different size than the previous version. Looking at an ftp mirror I see that orig.tar.gz also has the date of the dsc and diff files. Was that done intentional? I thought orig.tar.gz was uploa

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:29:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > diff files. Was that done intentional? I thought orig.tar.gz was uploaded > only once for every upstream version? I do not want to download 50MB for > every test build if 4MB are enough... Branden's X 4.0.1 packages are trac

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:28:59PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:29:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > diff files. Was that done intentional? I thought orig.tar.gz was uploaded > > only once for every upstream version? I do not want to download 50MB for > > ev

"slow" xdm startup

2000-11-29 Thread Jens Thiele
xdm startup takes 1-2minutes with 100% cpu strace shows that xdm is reading from /dev/urandom again and again: read(4, "V>\24\243B2B\330\346\24\215\322\202\277\276\340\275^\264"..., 8192) = 8192 read(4, "ES}\310\16\220\\\322\265(i\365\233t\3243\205uj\356\307"..., 8192) = 8192 read(4, "\230\16\26\

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Torbjörn Andersson
Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I was trying to build the latest x4.0 on m68k. I could not unpack because > the orig.tar.gz file has a different size than the previous version. Looking > at an ftp mirror I see that orig.tar.gz also has the date of the dsc and > diff files. Was that done intentiona

Re: "slow" xdm startup

2000-11-29 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 03:23:07PM +0100, Jens Thiele wrote: > xdm startup takes 1-2minutes with 100% cpu > strace shows that xdm is reading from /dev/urandom again and again: Hmmm, strange. FWIW, on my potato machine (2.2.17, promise pdc202xx.c patches only) I don't have this problem with the -

Re: Bug#78254 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#78254: xkb definition files should be locate on /usr subdirectory)

2000-11-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 06:39:50PM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:46:58PM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > > I would say that /etc/X11/xkb is not the best place for these files. > > > > Upstream disagrees. > > > > Hi > > May I know who is the "Upstream" ?? The XFr

[carlos@fisica.ufpr.br: info on 3.3.6 -> 4]

2000-11-29 Thread Branden Robinson
The short answer is yes. You just upgrade everything except xserver-*. - Forwarded message from Carlos Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Carlos Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: info on 3.3.6 -> 4 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 07:59:29 -0200 Deli

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 08:18:13AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:28:59PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:29:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > diff files. Was that done intentional? I thought orig.tar.gz was uploaded > > >

Re: 49734308 Nov 25 14:53 xfree86_4.0.1.orig.tar.gz

2000-11-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 03:31:06PM +0100, Torbjörn Andersson wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > I was trying to build the latest x4.0 on m68k. I could not unpack because > > the orig.tar.gz file has a different size than the previous version. Looking > > at an ftp mirror I see that orig.

upgrading to the X4 server

2000-11-29 Thread Johannes Zellner
Hi, is there any documentation how to upgrade from a 3.3.6 Server to the 4.x server? -- Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X 4 & xf86cfg

2000-11-29 Thread Johannes Zellner
Hello, wow, my X4 is already running. But when I try to use xf86cfg I get a message: Cannot open Cards database. what am I missing? -- Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

modules for the X 4.x server

2000-11-29 Thread Johannes Zellner
Hello, is there a location where I can find information about all the modules which are coming with the new X Server ? -- Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: upgrading to the X4 server

2000-11-29 Thread Seth Arnold
* Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001129 16:55]: > is there any documentation how to upgrade from > a 3.3.6 Server to the 4.x server? No, I don't think there is. However, this might help you: (And no, I don't know why I installed the proxy, frame buffer deal, nested X server, or what uses t

Re: X 4 & xf86cfg

2000-11-29 Thread Seth Arnold
* Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001129 18:14]: > wow, my X4 is already running. But when I try to use > xf86cfg I get a message: > > Cannot open Cards database. > > what am I missing? Line 164 in changelog.Debian.gz for xfree86-common: * debian/xserver-xfree86.*: stop shipping x

Re: modules for the X 4.x server

2000-11-29 Thread Seth Arnold
* Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001129 18:19]: > is there a location where I can find information about > all the modules which are coming with the new X Server ? Short of the source, I think my XF86Config-4 file is the closest thing around. :) $ cat /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 | grep -i load

Re: modules for the X 4.x server

2000-11-29 Thread Zephaniah E\. Hull
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:53:52PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote: > God only knows what int10 It is used for 'softbooting' video cards, basicly reiniting. Very likely used for your second head. > and record Hell if I know. > does. I also probably don't need > some of these (actually, glx/dri doesn'