On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 08:57:58AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'd particularly like the input of Brian Paul on this issue. Brian, do you
> > feel that libGL, libGLU, and libOSMesa should all occupy separate packages
> > in Debian, or should they be rolled together?
>
>
The size listed for xserver-xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v5_powerpc.deb in
powerpc/Packages.gz is 6746112, while the actual file is 8577356 bytes.
This prevents APT from installing the package. The package installs
without problems when downloaded manually.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:40:56PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> The size listed for xserver-xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v5_powerpc.deb in
> powerpc/Packages.gz is 6746112, while the actual file is 8577356 bytes.
>
> This prevents APT from installing the package. The package installs
> without problems wh
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:40:56PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> The size listed for xserver-xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v5_powerpc.deb in
> powerpc/Packages.gz is 6746112, while the actual file is 8577356 bytes.
>
> This prevents APT from installing the package. The package installs
> without problems wh
How do I unsubscribe from the debian-x mailing list?
Thanks
Chris Doyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> Sorry, Just downloaded v5 .dsc and .diff.gz, and noticed it's been added
> in v5 ... :(
Actually, I tried building v5 earlier and this wasn't fixed for me.
Also missing was ncurses-dev and whatever provides glide.h (the latter
which I don't really wan
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:19:28AM -0600, xanic wrote:
> How do I unsubscribe from the debian-x mailing list?
>
> Thanks
> Chris Doyle
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000912 23:29]:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:19:28AM -0600, xanic wrote:
> > How do I unsubscribe from the debian-x mailing list?
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
FWIW, I discovered with the v4 sources that the Sources.gz listed the
.diff and .dsc files for v3, though only v4 were actually available.
Perhaps something subtle is occuring with your update.sh?
-Dave Barnett
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:40:56PM -
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:27:02AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, I tried building v5 earlier and this wasn't fixed for me.
Don't know what kind of v5 you were using, then. libpam0g-dev and
libncurses5-dev are both declared as Build-Dependencies.
> Also missing was ncurses-dev and w
This was put into the archive last night:
Package: gnobog
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 233
Maintainer: Raphael Bossek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.4.0-1
Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8.1-1), libart2 (>= 1.2.4-3), libaudiofile0, libc6
(>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:
Hi Michael,
Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
Some fine software depends on the libforms packages :-)
Checkout the debian-x archive at lists.debian.org
t
Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you have xfonts-base installed?
- Forwarded message from David Raufeisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: David Raufeisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: phase2v5 on ppc imac
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:12:41 -0700
Delivered-To:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 01:34:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Actually, I tried building v5 earlier and this wasn't fixed for me.
>
> Don't know what kind of v5 you were using, then. libpam0g-dev and
> libncurses5-dev are both declared as Build-Dependencies.
NB better use libncurses-dev.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Mads Buus Jensen wrote:
> Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
> depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
> has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
xlibs isn't released yet. What should be done is
Seth R Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000912 23:29]:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:19:28AM -0600, xanic wrote:
> > > How do I unsubscribe from the debian-x mailing list?
> > > --
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Hey,
Yes I didn't have xbase-fonts installed (duh), now it gets further but another
problem, logs attached not the FB errors are only this verbose with no video
driver on, but it does the same thing regardless, also here is some stuff from
dmesg..
usb: usb-bandwidth-alloc: was: 129, new: 222, bus
Attached is my log output and XF86Config file.
Of note, is the error that gets displayed to the console (which isn't
in the log file):
FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO: Invalid argument
I suspect something got broken FB related?
Other than that, the packages installed fine :)
--
Josh
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
OK, Mach64 support in those packages for PowerPC is completely busted :(
I'm trying to work out what to do about it - it may be quite a while.
Further feedback on the other drivers is still welcome, though.
Dan
/\ /\
| Daniel
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:41:38AM -0400, Josh Huber wrote:
> Attached is my log output and XF86Config file.
>
> Of note, is the error that gets displayed to the console (which isn't
> in the log file):
> FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO: Invalid argument
>
> I suspect something got broken FB related?
>
> Ot
hi Michael,
> What a fun...
I would say that this is a bad sign for me!!! using here XF4 with my NVidia
card so long that forget that Debian support only XF3 :(
--
Raphael Bossek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ #40047651]
> The ATI Mach64 driver is known broken in these packages. We're working
> on a viable solution to it. Sorry.
I'll resync with Ani Joshi's source sometime soon and try if that's hosed
as well. I had it working as late as July 18, maybe something broke after
that date.
> > Found a Mach64 on a P
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:39:34PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > The ATI Mach64 driver is known broken in these packages. We're working
> > on a viable solution to it. Sorry.
>
> I'll resync with Ani Joshi's source sometime soon and try if that's hosed
> as well. I had it working as late as
> > > The ATI Mach64 driver is known broken in these packages. We're working
> > > on a viable solution to it. Sorry.
> >
> > I'll resync with Ani Joshi's source sometime soon and try if that's hosed
> > as well. I had it working as late as July 18, maybe something broke after
> > that date.
>
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 at 16:03:53 -0700, Marc Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Load "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so"
You were absolutely right -- replacing "glx" with the above
did the trick. I don't know why I missed this, as I got 4.0.1
working on a different debian bo
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:00:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I also resolved mouse issues I had by changing the repeat_type value in
> /etc/gpm.conf to "raw" ... /dev/gpmdata was causing erratic behavior
> before (gpm's fault, not X). So now gpm and X get along well, so
> everything works
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
>
> Repeat in what gpm calls ms3 and what X calls IntelliMouse.
> Unless you really LIKE shooting yourself in the foot.
That worked also (ie, same result as type "raw" in gpm.conf and "IMPS/2"
in XF86Config) ... I assumed that repeat type "imps2" wou
Though in bad taste, I'll reply above but leave the message intact
below.
In all protocols except ms3/IntelliMouse X4 attempts to communicate with
the mouse, trying this into a fifo is, err, a bad idea, largely because
X4 gets it right back as if it was sent by the mouse, resulting in the
erratic
Hi Michael,
Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
Some fine software depends on the libforms packages :-)
Checkout the debian-x archive at lists.debian.org
Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you have xfonts-base installed?
- Forwarded message from David Raufeisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: David Raufeisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: phase2v5 on ppc imac
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:12:41 -0700
Delivered-To:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 01:34:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Actually, I tried building v5 earlier and this wasn't fixed for me.
>
> Don't know what kind of v5 you were using, then. libpam0g-dev and
> libncurses5-dev are both declared as Build-Dependencies.
NB better use libncurses-dev
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Mads Buus Jensen wrote:
> Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
> depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
> has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
xlibs isn't released yet. What should be done is
Seth R Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000912 23:29]:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:19:28AM -0600, xanic wrote:
> > > How do I unsubscribe from the debian-x mailing list?
> > > --
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Hey,
Yes I didn't have xbase-fonts installed (duh), now it gets further but another
problem, logs attached not the FB errors are only this verbose with no video
driver on, but it does the same thing regardless, also here is some stuff from
dmesg..
usb: usb-bandwidth-alloc: was: 129, new: 222, bu
Attached is my log output and XF86Config file.
Of note, is the error that gets displayed to the console (which isn't
in the log file):
FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO: Invalid argument
I suspect something got broken FB related?
Other than that, the packages installed fine :)
--
Josh
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
OK, Mach64 support in those packages for PowerPC is completely busted :(
I'm trying to work out what to do about it - it may be quite a while.
Further feedback on the other drivers is still welcome, though.
Dan
/\ /\
| Danie
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:41:38AM -0400, Josh Huber wrote:
> Attached is my log output and XF86Config file.
>
> Of note, is the error that gets displayed to the console (which isn't
> in the log file):
> FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO: Invalid argument
>
> I suspect something got broken FB related?
>
> O
hi Michael,
> What a fun...
I would say that this is a bad sign for me!!! using here XF4 with my NVidia
card so long that forget that Debian support only XF3 :(
--
Raphael Bossek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ #40047651]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
> The ATI Mach64 driver is known broken in these packages. We're working
> on a viable solution to it. Sorry.
I'll resync with Ani Joshi's source sometime soon and try if that's hosed
as well. I had it working as late as July 18, maybe something broke after
that date.
> > Found a Mach64 on a
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:39:34PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > The ATI Mach64 driver is known broken in these packages. We're working
> > on a viable solution to it. Sorry.
>
> I'll resync with Ani Joshi's source sometime soon and try if that's hosed
> as well. I had it working as late as
> > > The ATI Mach64 driver is known broken in these packages. We're working
> > > on a viable solution to it. Sorry.
> >
> > I'll resync with Ani Joshi's source sometime soon and try if that's hosed
> > as well. I had it working as late as July 18, maybe something broke after
> > that date.
>
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 at 16:03:53 -0700, Marc Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Load "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so"
You were absolutely right -- replacing "glx" with the above
did the trick. I don't know why I missed this, as I got 4.0.1
working on a different debian b
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:00:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I also resolved mouse issues I had by changing the repeat_type value in
> /etc/gpm.conf to "raw" ... /dev/gpmdata was causing erratic behavior
> before (gpm's fault, not X). So now gpm and X get along well, so
> everything work
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
>
> Repeat in what gpm calls ms3 and what X calls IntelliMouse.
> Unless you really LIKE shooting yourself in the foot.
That worked also (ie, same result as type "raw" in gpm.conf and "IMPS/2"
in XF86Config) ... I assumed that repeat type "imps2" wo
Though in bad taste, I'll reply above but leave the message intact
below.
In all protocols except ms3/IntelliMouse X4 attempts to communicate with
the mouse, trying this into a fifo is, err, a bad idea, largely because
X4 gets it right back as if it was sent by the mouse, resulting in the
erratic
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Mads Buus Jensen wrote:
> Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
> depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
> has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
>
> Some fine software depends on the libforms p
Quoting Raphael Bossek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> hi Michael,
>
> > What a fun...
> I would say that this is a bad sign for me!!! using here XF4 with my NVidia
> card so long that forget that Debian support only XF3 :(
It was bound to happen, and it will probably be not the last package
to whic
47 matches
Mail list logo
