On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 11:38:45PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Kresimir Kukulj wrote:
> > > > Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> > > > xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
> > >
> > > Actually, curre
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 11:38:45PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Kresimir Kukulj wrote:
> > > > Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> > > > xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
> > >
> > > Actually, curr
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Kresimir Kukulj wrote:
> > > Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> > > xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
> >
> > Actually, current unstable libc6 is 2.1.94-*, the mirror you're using is
> > out of da
Quoting Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:59:31PM +0200, Kresimir Kukulj wrote:
> > Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> > xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
>
> Actually, current unstable libc6 is 2.1.94-*, the m
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:59:31PM +0200, Kresimir Kukulj wrote:
> Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
Actually, current unstable libc6 is 2.1.94-*, the mirror you're using is out
of date.
--
Digital Ele
* Kresimir Kukulj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000927 14:03]:
> Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
I don't know for sure what is going on, but it seems there was a
legitimate 2.1.93, but that it was broke and pos
Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
Am I missing something?
Regards
--
Kresimir Kukulj[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--+
Old PC's never die. They just b
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Kresimir Kukulj wrote:
> > > Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> > > xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
> >
> > Actually, current unstable libc6 is 2.1.94-*, the mirror you're using is
> > out of d
Quoting Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:59:31PM +0200, Kresimir Kukulj wrote:
> > Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> > xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
>
> Actually, current unstable libc6 is 2.1.94-*, the
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:59:31PM +0200, Kresimir Kukulj wrote:
> Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
Actually, current unstable libc6 is 2.1.94-*, the mirror you're using is out
of date.
--
Digital El
* Kresimir Kukulj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000927 14:03]:
> Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
> xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
I don't know for sure what is going on, but it seems there was a
legitimate 2.1.93, but that it was broke and po
Current unstable libc6 is 2.1.3-10. Is 2.1.93 an error or what?
xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v11 for example depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
Am I missing something?
Regards
--
Kresimir Kukulj[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--+
Old PC's never die. They just
12 matches
Mail list logo