On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 06:21, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> This is kinda late and may be stating the obvious, but there have been
> upstream releases of fontconfig: http://fontconfig.org/ . Uploading this
> to sid may be a good idea after all?
I don't want to do that before Branden splits xlibs-dev. My
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 06:21, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> This is kinda late and may be stating the obvious, but there have been
> upstream releases of fontconfig: http://fontconfig.org/ . Uploading this
> to sid may be a good idea after all?
I don't want to do that before Branden splits xlibs-dev. M
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 02:30, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at
> least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be
> part of the XFree distribution, so these packages are only temporary.
>
> Note however that my libx
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 02:30, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at
> least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be
> part of the XFree distribution, so these packages are only temporary.
>
> Note however that my libx
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 15:11, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [Please follow-up to both lists; I am not subscribed to
> debian-gtk-gnome.]
Ditto; I'm not on -x :)
> Okay, so that means you won't upload them to unstable, right?
Right.
> Keith Packard hasn't finished hacking on fontconfig yet; I see imp
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 15:11, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [Please follow-up to both lists; I am not subscribed to
> debian-gtk-gnome.]
Ditto; I'm not on -x :)
> Okay, so that means you won't upload them to unstable, right?
Right.
> Keith Packard hasn't finished hacking on fontconfig yet; I see im
[Please follow-up to both lists; I am not subscribed to
debian-gtk-gnome.]
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at
> least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be
> part of the XFr
[Please follow-up to both lists; I am not subscribed to
debian-gtk-gnome.]
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at
> least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be
> part of the XF
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
Hi,
> I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at
> least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be
> part of the XFree distribution, so these packages are only temporary.
Good idea :-)
Chri
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
Hi,
> I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at
> least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be
> part of the XFree distribution, so these packages are only temporary.
Good idea :-)
Chr
Hello all,
I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at
least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be
part of the XFree distribution, so these packages are only temporary.
Note however that my libxft2-dev package will divert parts of xlibs-dev,
be
Hello all,
I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at
least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be
part of the XFree distribution, so these packages are only temporary.
Note however that my libxft2-dev package will divert parts of xlibs-dev,
b
12 matches
Mail list logo
