Re: HPPA (and perhaps ARM) build fail (Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v4 (source) available at the X Strike Force)

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Waters
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:17:55PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > Is it normal that the xfree86_4.2.0.orig.tar.gz > changes between -pre releases? Yes, and I think it would make more sense (and would prefer it) if Branden gave all the pre-release .orig files unique names (e.g. "4.1.99.pre-1.4.2.0

Re: HPPA (and perhaps ARM) build fail (Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v4 (source) available at the X Strike Force)

2002-09-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:17:55PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > > cleaning in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/DevelDrivers... > > make: *** DevelDrivers: No such file or directory. Stop. > ... > > On Arm32Architecture and HPArchitecture refers `DevelDrivers' but >

Re: HPPA (and perhaps ARM) build fail (Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v4 (source) available at the X Strike Force)

2002-09-08 Thread Grant Grundler
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > cleaning in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/DevelDrivers... > make: *** DevelDrivers: No such file or directory. Stop. ... > On Arm32Architecture and HPArchitecture refers `DevelDrivers' but > DevelDrivers define is missing about these architecture. Is it normal tha

Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v4 (source) available at the X Strike Force

2002-09-08 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> i386 packages are on their way. >> >> We're getting close to something I'd consider acceptable for 4.2.0-1; >> this means those of you haven't built 4.2.0 in a while (or ever), like >> arm and s390 -- I'd really a

Re: HPPA (and perhaps ARM) build fail (Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v4 (source) available at the X Strike Force)

2002-09-04 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:51:46AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > Build on HPPA was failed (and perhaps will be failed on ARM): [...] > On Arm32Architecture and HPArchitecture refers `DevelDrivers' but > DevelDrivers define is missing about these architecture. > > For example, on PPC and m68k

HPPA (and perhaps ARM) build fail (Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v4 (source) available at the X Strike Force)

2002-09-04 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> i386 packages are on their way. >> >> We're getting close to something I'd consider acceptable for 4.2.0-1; >> this means those of you haven't built 4.2.0 in a while (or ever), like >> arm and s390 -- I'd really a

Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v4 (source) available at the X Strike Force

2002-09-04 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> i386 packages are on their way. >> >> We're getting close to something I'd consider acceptable for 4.2.0-1; >> this means those of you haven't built 4.2.0 in a while (or ever), like >> arm and s390 -- I'd really a

Re: xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v4 (source) available at the X Strike Force

2002-09-04 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> i386 packages are on their way. >> >> We're getting close to something I'd consider acceptable for 4.2.0-1; >> this means those of you haven't built 4.2.0 in a while (or ever), like >> arm and s390 -- I'd really a

xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v4 (source) available at the X Strike Force

2002-09-03 Thread Branden Robinson
[Please follow up to debian-x.] i386 packages are on their way. We're getting close to something I'd consider acceptable for 4.2.0-1; this means those of you haven't built 4.2.0 in a while (or ever), like arm and s390 -- I'd really appreciate it if you'd give this one a try. Changes: xfree86 (4