On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 21:11 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> I'm willing to implement biarch for etch, but definitely not for the 6.8
> series of packages.
>
> The 6.9 branch is technically open for development, but I still want to
> keep a focus on the goal of shipping the modular tree with etch.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:11:26PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:17:07AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > In an attempt to look about how to best bring biarch 64bit support to the
> > powerpc architecture, and after Andreas Jochens asked about powerpc 64bit
> > xlibs support
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:17:07AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> In an attempt to look about how to best bring biarch 64bit support to the
> powerpc architecture, and after Andreas Jochens asked about powerpc 64bit
> xlibs support for some apps he is using and which needs 64 bit support, i am
> wonde
On 05-Sep-23 14:03, Sven Luther wrote:
> Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Please do not start the naming debate for the ppc64 port again.
> > This has been discussed and decided months ago.
>
> Decided ? i don't think i was part of this discussion, and with the ppc/ppc64
> kernel upstream thingy chang
On 05-Sep-23 13:16, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:09:17PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > On 05-Sep-23 10:17, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > x apparently already builds just fine in 64bit mode, or at least Andreas
> > > Jochens has done it, and if multi-arch ever becomes really usable
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 02:06:22PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Sep-23 13:16, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:09:17PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > On 05-Sep-23 10:17, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > x apparently already builds just fine in 64bit mode, or at least Andrea
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:09:17PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Sep-23 10:17, Sven Luther wrote:
> > x apparently already builds just fine in 64bit mode, or at least Andreas
> > Jochens has done it, and if multi-arch ever becomes really usable, then
> > another approach would be needed, in
On 05-Sep-23 10:17, Sven Luther wrote:
> x apparently already builds just fine in 64bit mode, or at least Andreas
> Jochens has done it, and if multi-arch ever becomes really usable, then
> another approach would be needed, in the meantime, the biarch is support we
> will have for etch.
'xorg-x11'
Hello,
In an attempt to look about how to best bring biarch 64bit support to the
powerpc architecture, and after Andreas Jochens asked about powerpc 64bit
xlibs support for some apps he is using and which needs 64 bit support, i am
wondering what the opinion of the X strike force team is about add
9 matches
Mail list logo
