Re: unaccounted for X files

2003-03-13 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:44:14AM +0100, Frank Murphy scrawled: > So these files are created when installing the package, but the package > system doesn't know about them? And when the package is removed, these files > won't be removed? I would have thought that every file created with Debian >

Re: unaccounted for X files

2003-03-13 Thread Frank Murphy
So these files are created when installing the package, but the package system doesn't know about them? And when the package is removed, these files won't be removed? I would have thought that every file created with Debian tools (dpkg, debconf, etc.) would be accounted for. Is it not true tha

Re: unaccounted for X files

2003-03-13 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:44:14AM +0100, Frank Murphy scrawled: > So these files are created when installing the package, but the package > system doesn't know about them? And when the package is removed, these files > won't be removed? I would have thought that every file created with Debian >

Re: unaccounted for X files

2003-03-13 Thread Frank Murphy
So these files are created when installing the package, but the package system doesn't know about them? And when the package is removed, these files won't be removed? I would have thought that every file created with Debian tools (dpkg, debconf, etc.) would be accounted for. Is it not true tha

Re: unaccounted for X files

2003-03-12 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:29:28PM +0100, Frank Murphy scrawled: > There are some files which I imagine are part of one of the X client or > server packages, but they are unaccounted for in dpkg. I imagine that these > could be marked as conffiles. Is there a reason that dpkg shouldn't know > ab

Re: unaccounted for X files

2003-03-12 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:29:28PM +0100, Frank Murphy scrawled: > There are some files which I imagine are part of one of the X client or > server packages, but they are unaccounted for in dpkg. I imagine that these > could be marked as conffiles. Is there a reason that dpkg shouldn't know > ab

unaccounted for X files

2003-03-12 Thread Frank Murphy
There are some files which I imagine are part of one of the X client or server packages, but they are unaccounted for in dpkg. I imagine that these could be marked as conffiles. Is there a reason that dpkg shouldn't know about these? $ dpkg -S /etc/X11/X /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/Xwrapper

unaccounted for X files

2003-03-12 Thread Frank Murphy
There are some files which I imagine are part of one of the X client or server packages, but they are unaccounted for in dpkg. I imagine that these could be marked as conffiles. Is there a reason that dpkg shouldn't know about these? $ dpkg -S /etc/X11/X /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/Xwrapper