>> Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And no, "run the latest and greatest kernel" is not an option for most
> > people.
>
> The current DRM code doesn't even build with 2.2 if you mean that.
I know, but no, I don't mean that. In the current status some people
just can't affor
"Marcelo E. Magallon" wrote:
>
> >> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/
> >
> > until it's merged into the Linux kernel.
>
> Actually the xfree86 packages should provide a modules-dri-src kind of
> package. That would stop much of this madness.
W
>> Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And no, "run the latest and greatest kernel" is not an option for most
> > people.
>
> The current DRM code doesn't even build with 2.2 if you mean that.
I know, but no, I don't mean that. In the current status some people
just can't affo
>> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/
>
> until it's merged into the Linux kernel.
Actually the xfree86 packages should provide a modules-dri-src kind of
package. That would stop much of this madness. And no, "run the
latest and greatest kernel" is
"Marcelo E. Magallon" wrote:
>
> >> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/
> >
> > until it's merged into the Linux kernel.
>
> Actually the xfree86 packages should provide a modules-dri-src kind of
> package. That would stop much of this madness.
>> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/
>
> until it's merged into the Linux kernel.
Actually the xfree86 packages should provide a modules-dri-src kind of
package. That would stop much of this madness. And no, "run the
latest and greatest kernel" i
"Daniel T. Chen" wrote:
>
> Ok, I'm really going to make a FAQ. Really. =)
>
> You need to compile the kernmod from the X 4.1.0 tree. The version in the
> kernel(s) is outdated.
And for those who don't want to grab all the source, there's just what's
needed to build the DRM at
http://www.xfree8
Ok, I'm really going to make a FAQ. Really. =)
You need to compile the kernmod from the X 4.1.0 tree. The version in the
kernel(s) is outdated.
---
Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> (EE) RAD
Just put my spiffy new Radeon in my machine, downloaded 4.1.0-0pre1v1.3
to try and get 3D accel working. I just now recompiled 2.4.5 with ATI
Radeon support. Well, no luck, still looks like software-rendering.
So, naturally, the logs:
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIScreenInit failed because of a v
Ok, I'm really going to make a FAQ. Really. =)
You need to compile the kernmod from the X 4.1.0 tree. The version in the
kernel(s) is outdated.
---
Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> (EE) RA
Just put my spiffy new Radeon in my machine, downloaded 4.1.0-0pre1v1.3
to try and get 3D accel working. I just now recompiled 2.4.5 with ATI
Radeon support. Well, no luck, still looks like software-rendering.
So, naturally, the logs:
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIScreenInit failed because of a
11 matches
Mail list logo
