On 5 Mar 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op di 04-03-2003, om 22:24 schreef Geert Uytterhoeven:
> [added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the Cc list; -x and -powerpc should
> probably be removed, so setting reply-to]
> > > There are actually some 2.4 kernels available for m68k, but due to an
> > > issue relate
On 5 Mar 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op di 04-03-2003, om 22:24 schreef Geert Uytterhoeven:
> [added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the Cc list; -x and -powerpc should
> probably be removed, so setting reply-to]
> > > There are actually some 2.4 kernels available for m68k, but due to an
> > > issue relate
Op di 04-03-2003, om 22:24 schreef Geert Uytterhoeven:
[added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the Cc list; -x and -powerpc should
probably be removed, so setting reply-to]
> > There are actually some 2.4 kernels available for m68k, but due to an
> > issue related to glibc[1] that started somewhere in the glib
Op di 04-03-2003, om 22:24 schreef Geert Uytterhoeven:
[added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the Cc list; -x and -powerpc should
probably be removed, so setting reply-to]
> > There are actually some 2.4 kernels available for m68k, but due to an
> > issue related to glibc[1] that started somewhere in the glib
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:24:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > What's the real problem? I'm running 2.4.20 (from Linux/m68k CVS) on my
> > Amiga,
> > with glibc-2.2.5-3? Or is this version glibc too old to exhibit the problem?
>
> I am t
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:24:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > What's the real problem? I'm running 2.4.20 (from Linux/m68k CVS) on my Amiga,
> > with glibc-2.2.5-3? Or is this version glibc too old to exhibit the problem?
>
> I am trying
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:24:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> What's the real problem? I'm running 2.4.20 (from Linux/m68k CVS) on my Amiga,
> with glibc-2.2.5-3? Or is this version glibc too old to exhibit the problem?
I am trying to build some 2.4.20 packages. The last version I tried
At 04 Mar 2003 20:18:00 +0100,
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> Op ma 03-03-2003, om 23:45 schreef Branden Robinson:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > > Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit :
> > >
> > > >To date, no kernels with the feature of se
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:24:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> What's the real problem? I'm running 2.4.20 (from Linux/m68k CVS) on my Amiga,
> with glibc-2.2.5-3? Or is this version glibc too old to exhibit the problem?
I am trying to build some 2.4.20 packages. The last version I tried
At 04 Mar 2003 20:18:00 +0100,
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> Op ma 03-03-2003, om 23:45 schreef Branden Robinson:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > > Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit :
> > >
> > > >To date, no kernels with the feature of se
On 4 Mar 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op ma 03-03-2003, om 23:45 schreef Branden Robinson:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > > Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit :
> > >
> > > >To date, no kernels with the feature of sending Linux keycode
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:18:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> There are actually some 2.4 kernels available for m68k, but due to an
> issue related to glibc[1] that started somewhere in the glibc-2.2 area,
> they don't boot.
[...]
Okay, thanks!
--
G. Branden Robinson| W
On 4 Mar 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op ma 03-03-2003, om 23:45 schreef Branden Robinson:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > > Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit :
> > >
> > > >To date, no kernels with the feature of sending Linux keycode
Op ma 03-03-2003, om 23:45 schreef Branden Robinson:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit :
> >
> > >To date, no kernels with the feature of sending Linux keycodes exist
> > > for
> > >m68k-based Macintosh
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:18:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> There are actually some 2.4 kernels available for m68k, but due to an
> issue related to glibc[1] that started somewhere in the glibc-2.2 area,
> they don't boot.
[...]
Okay, thanks!
--
G. Branden Robinson| W
Op ma 03-03-2003, om 23:45 schreef Branden Robinson:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit :
> >
> > >To date, no kernels with the feature of sending Linux keycodes exist for
> > >m68k-based Macintoshes.
> >
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:24:05AM -0800, Brett Carter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:10:05AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > Couldn't you simply point people to
> > http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/keycodes, or at least make the entry
> > much shorter in favour of that pointer?
> >
>
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit :
>
> >To date, no kernels with the feature of sending Linux keycodes exist for
> >m68k-based Macintoshes.
>
> You should perhaps indicate the date and kernel version this
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:24:05AM -0800, Brett Carter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:10:05AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > Couldn't you simply point people to
> > http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/keycodes, or at least make the entry
> > much shorter in favour of that pointer?
> >
>
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit :
>
> >To date, no kernels with the feature of sending Linux keycodes exist for
> >m68k-based Macintoshes.
>
> You should perhaps indicate the date and kernel version this
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:10:05AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> Couldn't you simply point people to
> http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/keycodes, or at least make the entry
> much shorter in favour of that pointer?
>
Yup, I must agree with Michel, no need to duplicate information that's
alre
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:10:05AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> Couldn't you simply point people to
> http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/keycodes, or at least make the entry
> much shorter in favour of that pointer?
>
Yup, I must agree with Michel, no need to duplicate information that's
alre
Le lun 03/03/2003 à 01:36, Branden Robinson a écrit :
>To date, no kernels with the feature of sending Linux keycodes exist for
>m68k-based Macintoshes.
You should perhaps indicate the date and kernel version this refers to.
Xav
On 3 Mar 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> However, I'd like to suggest adding another entry, regarding the fact
> that on (at least) m68k-macs, it is *impossible* to switch the color
> depth or screen resolution of the display under Linux; one has to choose
> the display depth which is chosen under M
Le lun 03/03/2003 à 01:36, Branden Robinson a écrit :
>To date, no kernels with the feature of sending Linux keycodes exist for
>m68k-based Macintoshes.
You should perhaps indicate the date and kernel version this refers to.
Xav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On 3 Mar 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> However, I'd like to suggest adding another entry, regarding the fact
> that on (at least) m68k-macs, it is *impossible* to switch the color
> depth or screen resolution of the display under Linux; one has to choose
> the display depth which is chosen under M
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:24:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op ma 03-03-2003, om 01:36 schreef Branden Robinson:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm adding the following FAQ entry to the Debian X FAQ.
>
> You have a FAQ? Nice. Didn't know. Where can I find it?
http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:24:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op ma 03-03-2003, om 01:36 schreef Branden Robinson:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm adding the following FAQ entry to the Debian X FAQ.
>
> You have a FAQ? Nice. Didn't know. Where can I find it?
http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 01:36, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I'm adding the following FAQ entry to the Debian X FAQ.
>
> I would very much appreciate correction of any factual errors I have
> made.
>
> Also, because my FAQ is freely licensed[1], please feel free to borrow
> as much of this as you ma
Op ma 03-03-2003, om 01:36 schreef Branden Robinson:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm adding the following FAQ entry to the Debian X FAQ.
You have a FAQ? Nice. Didn't know. Where can I find it?
> I would very much appreciate correction of any factual errors I have
> made.
As far as I'm concerned (m68k-side
Hi folks,
I'm adding the following FAQ entry to the Debian X FAQ.
I would very much appreciate correction of any factual errors I have
made.
Also, because my FAQ is freely licensed[1], please feel free to borrow
as much of this as you may need for any other FAQ.
*) I'm using a Macintosh, and wh
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 01:36, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I'm adding the following FAQ entry to the Debian X FAQ.
>
> I would very much appreciate correction of any factual errors I have
> made.
>
> Also, because my FAQ is freely licensed[1], please feel free to borrow
> as much of this as you ma
Op ma 03-03-2003, om 01:36 schreef Branden Robinson:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm adding the following FAQ entry to the Debian X FAQ.
You have a FAQ? Nice. Didn't know. Where can I find it?
> I would very much appreciate correction of any factual errors I have
> made.
As far as I'm concerned (m68k-side
Hi folks,
I'm adding the following FAQ entry to the Debian X FAQ.
I would very much appreciate correction of any factual errors I have
made.
Also, because my FAQ is freely licensed[1], please feel free to borrow
as much of this as you may need for any other FAQ.
*) I'm using a Macintosh, and wh
34 matches
Mail list logo
