On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:56:51PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> I was only asking about 3.3.6 wrt support of older cards, not necessarily
> about porting to hurd. I have two Diamond Stealth Edge 3D's (NV1)
> which are only about 4 years old. X has a long history of supporting
> just about all the
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 12:17:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:18:00PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:56:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > Please, please, please focus your efforts on XFree86 4.x instead of
> > > fighting wit
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:18:00PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:56:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Please, please, please focus your efforts on XFree86 4.x instead of
> > fighting with me. I have nothing against the Hurd, but 3.3.6 as it exists
> > in potato
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:56:51PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> I was only asking about 3.3.6 wrt support of older cards, not necessarily
> about porting to hurd. I have two Diamond Stealth Edge 3D's (NV1)
> which are only about 4 years old. X has a long history of supporting
> just about all th
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 12:17:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:18:00PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:56:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > Please, please, please focus your efforts on XFree86 4.x instead of
> > > fighting wi
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:56:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Please, please, please focus your efforts on XFree86 4.x instead of
> fighting with me. I have nothing against the Hurd, but 3.3.6 as it exists
> in potato is dead, dead, dead. There's no sense applying your patches to
> it; t
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:18:00PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:56:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Please, please, please focus your efforts on XFree86 4.x instead of
> > fighting with me. I have nothing against the Hurd, but 3.3.6 as it exists
> > in potat
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:44:45PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 12:39:25AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > These are not release-critical problems. All are in reference to the 3.x
> > branch of XFree86, which not actively maintained. Patches for Hurd support
> > in
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:56:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Please, please, please focus your efforts on XFree86 4.x instead of
> fighting with me. I have nothing against the Hurd, but 3.3.6 as it exists
> in potato is dead, dead, dead. There's no sense applying your patches to
> it;
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:44:45PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 12:39:25AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > These are not release-critical problems. All are in reference to the 3.x
> > branch of XFree86, which not actively maintained. Patches for Hurd support
> > in
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 12:39:25AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> severity 72041 normal
> severity 72135 normal
> severity 70750 normal
> thanks
>
> These are not release-critical problems. All are in reference to the 3.x
> branch of XFree86, which not actively maintained. Patches for Hurd sup
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 12:39:25AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> severity 72041 normal
> severity 72135 normal
> severity 70750 normal
> thanks
>
> These are not release-critical problems. All are in reference to the 3.x
> branch of XFree86, which not actively maintained. Patches for Hurd su
12 matches
Mail list logo
