Re: r128 driver, unresolved symbols, XF86 4.0.2-1

2001-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Some Mach64 based chips cause problems with 2.2 kernels so he might need to > also use a 2.4 one or a patch from Michael Schmitz (check the -powerpc > archives). Or use yaboot. Michael

Re: r128 driver, unresolved symbols, XF86 4.0.2-1

2001-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Some Mach64 based chips cause problems with 2.2 kernels so he might need to > also use a 2.4 one or a patch from Michael Schmitz (check the -powerpc > archives). Or use yaboot. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: r128 driver, unresolved symbols, XF86 4.0.2-1

2001-01-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:23:32AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > jingai wrote: > > > And I was specifying "r128" in the Device section before this release, > > > which worked up until now. "ati" works fine though, so it's not a huge > > > deal, but it's obviously a b

Re: r128 driver, unresolved symbols, XF86 4.0.2-1

2001-01-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:23:32AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > jingai wrote: > > > And I was specifying "r128" in the Device section before this release, > > > which worked up until now. "ati" works fine though, so it's not a huge > > > deal, but it's obviously a

Re: r128 driver, unresolved symbols, XF86 4.0.2-1

2001-01-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:23:32AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > jingai wrote: > > And I was specifying "r128" in the Device section before this release, > > which worked up until now. "ati" works fine though, so it's not a huge > > deal, but it's obviously a buglet, probably introduced when mergi

Re: r128 driver, unresolved symbols, XF86 4.0.2-1

2001-01-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:23:32AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > jingai wrote: > > And I was specifying "r128" in the Device section before this release, > > which worked up until now. "ati" works fine though, so it's not a huge > > deal, but it's obviously a buglet, probably introduced when merg

Re: r128 driver, unresolved symbols, XF86 4.0.2-1

2001-01-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
jingai wrote: > > > > hah, weird.. the "ati" driver works fine, and it is definitely > > > accelerated.. .but the r128 driver won't load due to the unresolved > > > symbols.. > > > > The former r128 and radeon drivers have been integrated into the ati > > driver, so r128_drv.o is only a submodule

Re: r128 driver, unresolved symbols, XF86 4.0.2-1

2001-01-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
jingai wrote: > > > > hah, weird.. the "ati" driver works fine, and it is definitely > > > accelerated.. .but the r128 driver won't load due to the unresolved > > > symbols.. > > > > The former r128 and radeon drivers have been integrated into the ati > > driver, so r128_drv.o is only a submodule