On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 07:51:43PM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:07:05AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > XFree86 was last attempted on February 26th.
> >
> > It failed to build because one of its build-deps wasn't yet up-to-date:
>
> sorry, haven't been reading debi
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 07:51:43PM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:07:05AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > XFree86 was last attempted on February 26th.
> >
> > It failed to build because one of its build-deps wasn't yet up-to-date:
>
> sorry, haven't been reading debi
hi,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:07:05AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> XFree86 was last attempted on February 26th.
>
> It failed to build because one of its build-deps wasn't yet up-to-date:
sorry, haven't been reading debian-arm and elmo hasn't replied
yet, so I have forwarded this request to
hi,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:07:05AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> XFree86 was last attempted on February 26th.
>
> It failed to build because one of its build-deps wasn't yet up-to-date:
sorry, haven't been reading debian-arm and elmo hasn't replied
yet, so I have forwarded this request to
[I am not subscribed to debian-arm.]
XFree86 was last attempted on February 26th.
It failed to build because one of its build-deps wasn't yet up-to-date:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpaperg: Depends: libpaper1 (= 1.1.13) but it is not going to be installed
[I am not subscribed to debian-arm.]
XFree86 was last attempted on February 26th.
It failed to build because one of its build-deps wasn't yet up-to-date:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpaperg: Depends: libpaper1 (= 1.1.13) but it is not going to be installed
6 matches
Mail list logo
