On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 09:39:23PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Okay, finally finished building this morning (various difficulties), and
> installed successfully; just uploaded. Sorry about the delay.
>
> And good news, it even seems to work! But I haven't pushed it yet...
Thanks!
> The ne
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 16:15, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:54:08AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Is anyone building -0pre1v4? If not I've got a build going and can
> > upload when it's done. (Tried to install -0pre1v3 last night, but
> > xlibs-data is only -0pre1v4.)
>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:54:08AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Is anyone building -0pre1v4? If not I've got a build going and can
> upload when it's done. (Tried to install -0pre1v3 last night, but
> xlibs-data is only -0pre1v4.)
I would very much like to see an ARM upload of -0pre1v4.
> A
Hello,
Is anyone building -0pre1v4? If not I've got a build going and can
upload when it's done. (Tried to install -0pre1v3 last night, but
xlibs-data is only -0pre1v4.)
Also, I noticed two problem along the way. First, there seems to be a
circular dependency here. xfree86 needs libxcursor-de
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 03:19:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> After the s390-specific commits I made today, Bastian seems to have had
> a successful build of a (modified) 4.3.0-0pre1v3.
no, it failes on usr/X11R6/lib/X11/doc/README.dps (xfree86-common)
bastian
--
The heart is not a logica
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 03:19:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> After the s390-specific commits I made today, Bastian seems to have had
> a successful build of a (modified) 4.3.0-0pre1v3.
no, it failes on usr/X11R6/lib/X11/doc/README.dps (xfree86-common)
bastian
--
The heart is not a logica
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:17:57PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:58:56PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 03:50, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > * s390 has never tried to
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:17:57PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:58:56PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 03:50, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > * s390 has never tried to
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:58:56PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 03:50, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
> >
> > Bastian Blank attemp
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:58:56PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 03:50, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
> >
> > Bastian Blank attemp
[I am not subscribed to debian-s390.]
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:16:30PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:50:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
> >
> > Bastian Blank attempted several times, got tripped
[I am not subscribed to debian-s390.]
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:16:30PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:50:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
> >
> > Bastian Blank attempted several times, got tripped
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:50:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
>
> Bastian Blank attempted several times, got tripped up by the DRI foolery and
> other NOT_BUILDING_XF86_SERVER fun, and ended up giving up.
After getting enough
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:50:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
>
> Bastian Blank attempted several times, got tripped up by the DRI foolery and
> other NOT_BUILDING_XF86_SERVER fun, and ended up giving up.
After getting enough
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 03:50, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
>
> Bastian Blank attempted several times, got tripped up by the DRI foolery [...]
What's 'th
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 03:50, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
>
> Bastian Blank attempted several times, got tripped up by the DRI foolery [...]
What's 'th
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Four architectures are lagging the version of xfree86 in experimental,
> and three of them have never attempted to build xfree86 4.3.0 at all, at
> least according to madison.
>
> Please, please, build xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v3 from e
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Four architectures are lagging the version of xfree86 in experimental,
> and three of them have never attempted to build xfree86 4.3.0 at all, at
> least according to madison.
>
> Please, please, build xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v3 from e
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> * mips successfully built 4.3.0-0pre1v1 but hasn't attempted
> 4.3.0-0pre1v3.
> * arm was holding off for a PCI handling fix that affectec RiscPC
> machines; this fix is in 4.3.0-0pre1v3; please try to build it.
> * mipsel has
[Please CC debian-x on replies. I am not subscribed to -arm, -mips, or
-s390.]
Hi,
Four architectures are lagging the version of xfree86 in experimental,
and three of them have never attempted to build xfree86 4.3.0 at all, at
least according to madison.
Please, please, build xfree86 4.3.0-0pre
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> * mips successfully built 4.3.0-0pre1v1 but hasn't attempted
> 4.3.0-0pre1v3.
> * arm was holding off for a PCI handling fix that affectec RiscPC
> machines; this fix is in 4.3.0-0pre1v3; please try to build it.
> * mipsel has
[Please CC debian-x on replies. I am not subscribed to -arm, -mips, or
-s390.]
Hi,
Four architectures are lagging the version of xfree86 in experimental,
and three of them have never attempted to build xfree86 4.3.0 at all, at
least according to madison.
Please, please, build xfree86 4.3.0-0pre
22 matches
Mail list logo
