In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stuart Ballard writes:
>I can't tell you either, but you may be able to get some useful
>information by diffing the MANIFEST.arm.new against MANIFEST.arm.
Oops, didn't I include that output in my original mail? I certainly intended
to.
p.
Philip Blundell wrote:
>
> I ran a build of xfree86-4.0.2-7 on ARM. Aside from needing one small patch
> to elf.h (attached) the compilation went OK, but the manifest check failed. I
> don't know enough about what goes on here to say whether the manifest is just
> wrong or outdated, or whether s
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stuart Ballard writes:
>I can't tell you either, but you may be able to get some useful
>information by diffing the MANIFEST.arm.new against MANIFEST.arm.
Oops, didn't I include that output in my original mail? I certainly intended
to.
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Philip Blundell wrote:
>
> I ran a build of xfree86-4.0.2-7 on ARM. Aside from needing one small patch
> to elf.h (attached) the compilation went OK, but the manifest check failed. I
> don't know enough about what goes on here to say whether the manifest is just
> wrong or outdated, or whether
I ran a build of xfree86-4.0.2-7 on ARM. Aside from needing one small patch
to elf.h (attached) the compilation went OK, but the manifest check failed. I
don't know enough about what goes on here to say whether the manifest is just
wrong or outdated, or whether something bad happened.
Thanks
I ran a build of xfree86-4.0.2-7 on ARM. Aside from needing one small patch
to elf.h (attached) the compilation went OK, but the manifest check failed. I
don't know enough about what goes on here to say whether the manifest is just
wrong or outdated, or whether something bad happened.
Thanks
6 matches
Mail list logo