Hi David,
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:07:29 +0100 David Paleino wrote:
> I prepared a package with an updated LRMI:
>
> http://alioth.debian.org/~hanska-guest/apt/unstable/libx86_1.1+ds1-3.dsc
>
> All the people involved: would you please testbuild your packages against it?
> Thank you.
Sorry that I
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:07:29PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> Matthew: since you're libx86 upstream, you might be interested in the contents
> of debian/patches, I'll remove those as soon as you release a new version
> (also, please drop debian/ from upstream tarballs)
Thanks, I'll take a look
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:49:33 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> [..]
> David, is there any chance that libx86 will be updated someday? Esp
> because upstream of v86d has an updated 0.10 in his git at
> http://repo.or.cz/w/v86d.git and Debian's v86d is not using it in
> favour of not build duplicate code.
Dear debian-devel,
dear maintainers of packages that contain lrmi.{c,h},
today Lucas has reported #518725 - atitvout FTBFS because of missing
*_MASK defines.
Seeing that bug and remembering fun with lrmi myself, I thought I can
have a look how many other packages will FTBFS.
The following package
4 matches
Mail list logo
