Re: locale[s]/LANG broken in unstable

2001-09-20 Thread Stuart Ballard
Heitzso wrote: > > I run debian unstable and this morning, after updating, noticed that > 'man' complained about a bad LANG or LC_ setting. > > My LANG was set to 'english' and LC_CTYPE was set, > but set to blank or nothing, i.e. 'set' showed it but nothing > was after the equals sign. I had a

locale[s]/LANG broken in unstable

2001-09-20 Thread Heitzso
I run debian unstable and this morning, after updating, noticed that 'man' complained about a bad LANG or LC_ setting. My LANG was set to 'english' and LC_CTYPE was set, but set to blank or nothing, i.e. 'set' showed it but nothing was after the equals sign. I started trying to track this down a

Re: locale[s]/LANG broken in unstable

2001-09-20 Thread Stuart Ballard
Heitzso wrote: > > I run debian unstable and this morning, after updating, noticed that > 'man' complained about a bad LANG or LC_ setting. > > My LANG was set to 'english' and LC_CTYPE was set, > but set to blank or nothing, i.e. 'set' showed it but nothing > was after the equals sign. I had a

locale[s]/LANG broken in unstable

2001-09-20 Thread Heitzso
I run debian unstable and this morning, after updating, noticed that 'man' complained about a bad LANG or LC_ setting. My LANG was set to 'english' and LC_CTYPE was set, but set to blank or nothing, i.e. 'set' showed it but nothing was after the equals sign. I started trying to track this down a