Re: libxft for lenny

2007-02-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 13:34:49 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Were any of these symbols ever exposed in the published headers? If not, > then I think it's pretty clear-cut that the symbols are internal and can be > safely dropped without worrying about ABI breakage. > As far as I can see, they

Re: libxft for lenny

2007-02-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 02:36:30AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > xft upstream stopped exporting a bunch of internal symbols in 2.1.9 [1], > which strictly speaking means we should have to bump the ABI. libxft2 > had 307 reverse-dependencies in sid/main/i386 last I checked, though, so > transition

libxft for lenny

2007-02-10 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, xft upstream stopped exporting a bunch of internal symbols in 2.1.9 [1], which strictly speaking means we should have to bump the ABI. libxft2 had 307 reverse-dependencies in sid/main/i386 last I checked, though, so transitioning to libxft3 doesn't seem like something we really want to do. So