On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 20:35:32 +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2016, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>unless there is no new consent found in #798476, the policy is still
> >>valid and I have to reject your package:
> >> E: libxfont source: no-human-maintainers
> >>
> >
Hi Julien,
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016, Julien Cristau wrote:
unless there is no new consent found in #798476, the policy is still
valid and I have to reject your package:
E: libxfont source: no-human-maintainers
No, you very much don't "have to". That lintian warning doesn't make
the package unsuit
as requested
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 22:00:09 +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> unless there is no new consent found in #798476, the policy is still
> valid and I have to reject your package:
> E: libxfont source: no-human-maintainers
>
No, you very much don't "have to". That lintian warn
Hi Timo,
unless there is no new consent found in #798476, the policy is still
valid and I have to reject your package:
E: libxfont source: no-human-maintainers
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 18:00:08 +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> can you please take care of:
> E: libxfont source: no-human-maintainers
>
This is not new, it's how most debian-x packages are today, see
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/no-human-maintainers.html and bug
#798476,
Hi Timo,
can you please take care of:
E: libxfont source: no-human-maintainers
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
7 matches
Mail list logo