* Michel Dänzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040805 18:48]:
> On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 18:20 +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > * Michel Dänzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040805 18:11]:
> > > Are you sure it was installed as part of a package in the first place,
> > > not from a local build or non-Debian installati
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 18:20 +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Michel Dänzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040805 18:11]:
> > Are you sure it was installed as part of a package in the first place,
> > not from a local build or non-Debian installation?
>
> um, how could i be *sure* of that?
E.g. if you kne
* Michel Dänzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040805 18:11]:
> Are you sure it was installed as part of a package in the first place,
> not from a local build or non-Debian installation?
um, how could i be *sure* of that? i find it unlikely, though.
checking the debian-kde archive, many people see this pr
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 18:04 +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040805 17:40]:
> > Most likely an outdated libXrender.so.1 lying somewhere
> > between /usr/local/lib and /usr/X11R6/lib.
>
> yes, there was an old libXrender in /usr/X11R6/lib. it was not
> part o
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040805 17:40]:
> Most likely an outdated libXrender.so.1 lying somewhere
> between /usr/local/lib and /usr/X11R6/lib.
yes, there was an old libXrender in /usr/X11R6/lib. it was not
part of any package. removing it fixed the problem.
so an old libxrender was
5 matches
Mail list logo