On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Mads Buus Jensen wrote:
> Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
> depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
> has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
>
> Some fine software depends on the libforms pa
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Mads Buus Jensen wrote:
> Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
> depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
> has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
>
> Some fine software depends on the libforms p
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Mads Buus Jensen wrote:
> Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
> depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
> has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
xlibs isn't released yet. What should be done is
Hi Michael,
Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
Some fine software depends on the libforms packages :-)
Checkout the debian-x archive at lists.debian.org
t
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Mads Buus Jensen wrote:
> Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
> depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
> has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
xlibs isn't released yet. What should be done is
Hi Michael,
Is it possible to have you repackage the libforms libraries to
depend on xlibs instead of xpm4g, since the upcoming xfree4 debs
has put these into the xlibs package, I believe.
Some fine software depends on the libforms packages :-)
Checkout the debian-x archive at lists.debian.org
6 matches
Mail list logo