On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:54:26PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi scrawled:
> Hi,
>
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > > What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the
> >> > > debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually j
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:54:26PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi scrawled:
> Hi,
>
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > > What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the
> >> > > debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually j
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Son, 2003-01-05 at 03:10, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
>> > >> vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
>> > >
On Son, 2003-01-05 at 03:10, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
> >> vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some ot
> In <1041815288.1927.18.camel@thor>
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Son, 2003-01-05 at 03:10, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
>> > >> vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some
On Son, 2003-01-05 at 03:10, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
> >> vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some ot
Humm...
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
>> vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
>> hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environm
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Ishikawa,
>> I'm currently experiencing severe problems with Freetype, but everything
>> else is working out perfectly. Once I sort out the Freetype mess, I'll
>> send you a sources list.
Thanks :-)
>> My
Humm...
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
>> vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
>> hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environm
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Ishikawa,
>> I'm currently experiencing severe problems with Freetype, but everything
>> else is working out perfectly. Once I sort out the Freetype mess, I'll
>> send you a sources list.
Thanks :-)
>> My
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:54:26PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi scrawled:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > > What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the
> >> > > debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just
> >>
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:54:26PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi scrawled:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > > What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the
> >> > > debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copie
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the
>> > > debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just
>> > > copied the
>> > > patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patc
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the
>> > > debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copied the
>> > > patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:44:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3
> > packaged
> > on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative a
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:44:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 packaged
> > on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and
>
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3
> packaged
> on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and
> looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the >=900 patches up to spee
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 packaged
> on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and
> looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the >=900 patches up to speed w
I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 packaged
on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and
looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the >=900 patches up to speed with
4.3. The build system apparently tries to apply patches from the
I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 packaged
on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and
looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the >=900 patches up to speed with
4.3. The build system apparently tries to apply patches from the
20 matches
Mail list logo
