Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 15:45, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > > > Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: > > > > > > What compiler version has been used for the exper

Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Sven Luther wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 packages currently in "experimental"? I guess it is some version of 3.3 which was the de

Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > > Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: > > > > What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 > > packages currently in "experimental"?

Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > > Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: > > What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 > packages currently in "experimental"? I guess it is some version of 3.3 which was the default gcc compile

Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: > > What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 > packages currently in "experimental"? GCC 3.3.2pre2. -- Daniel Stone

gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 packages currently in "experimental"? Thomas -- Thomas Winischhofer Vienna/Austria thomas AT winischhofer DOT net *** http://www.winischhofer.net/ twini AT xfree86 DOT org

Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 15:45, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > > > Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: > > > > > > What compiler version has been used for the exper

Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Sven Luther wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 packages currently in "experimental"? I guess it is some version of 3.3 which was the defaul

Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > > Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: > > > > What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 > > packages currently in "experimental"?

Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > > Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: > > What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 > packages currently in "experimental"? I guess it is some version of 3.3 which was the default gcc compile

Re: gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: > > What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 > packages currently in "experimental"? GCC 3.3.2pre2. -- Daniel Stone

gcc question

2003-09-10 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Please allow me a perhaps redundant question: What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86 packages currently in "experimental"? Thomas -- Thomas Winischhofer Vienna/Austria thomas AT winischhofer DOT net *** http://www.winischhofer.net/ twini AT xfree86 DOT org