* David Nusinow wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:48:21AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Since it's unlikely for compiz 0.2 to go into etch, I was planning on
> > building 0.2 for experimental. What would be the best way to do so in SVN?
> > Should I just add an experimental branch? I know I co
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:48:21AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Since it's unlikely for compiz 0.2 to go into etch, I was planning on
> building 0.2 for experimental. What would be the best way to do so in SVN?
> Should I just add an experimental branch? I know I could possibly just do
> this in
Since it's unlikely for compiz 0.2 to go into etch, I was planning on
building 0.2 for experimental. What would be the best way to do so in SVN?
Should I just add an experimental branch? I know I could possibly just do
this in the trunk, but the plan is to keep the packaging separate because I
will
3 matches
Mail list logo
