Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-12 Thread Philip Blundell
>By itself this is pretty odd, but #56 is simply not defined in >/usr/include/elf.h at all. I am rebuilding right now (a 10-hour >process) with "Elf_Rel" rather than "Elf_Rela" setup, to see if that >makes a difference. (Seing that ARM, like i386, unlike any of the >other processors, is Little En

Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-12 Thread Philip Blundell
>By itself this is pretty odd, but #56 is simply not defined in >/usr/include/elf.h at all. I am rebuilding right now (a 10-hour >process) with "Elf_Rel" rather than "Elf_Rela" setup, to see if that >makes a difference. (Seing that ARM, like i386, unlike any of the >other processors, is Little E

Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-11 Thread Tor Slettnes
> "Peter" == Peter Maydell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> I tried putting together some patches based on a Peter> combination of the 3.x ARM patches and the 4.0 patches for Peter> other non-x86 architectures; it's now falling over with a Peter> compile error in elfloader.c.

Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-11 Thread Tor Slettnes
> "Peter" == Peter Maydell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> I tried putting together some patches based on a Peter> combination of the 3.x ARM patches and the 4.0 patches for Peter> other non-x86 architectures; it's now falling over with a Peter> compile error in elfloader.c

Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-11 Thread Peter Maydell
Branden Robinson wrote: >On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:09:51PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: >> # remove the upstream symlink X -> XFree86 >> This symlink does not exist because the XFree86 server binary was not built >> in the first place and therefore no symlink was created. > >That's bad. >> [Would

Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-11 Thread Peter Maydell
Branden Robinson wrote: >On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:09:51PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: >> # remove the upstream symlink X -> XFree86 >> This symlink does not exist because the XFree86 server binary was not built >> in the first place and therefore no symlink was created. > >That's bad. >> [Would

Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:09:51PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: > # remove the upstream symlink X -> XFree86 > rm /.1/usr/local/src/xfree86-4.0.1/debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/bin/X > rm: cannot remove > `/.1/usr/local/src/xfree86-4.0.1/debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/bin/X': No such file or > directory > make: *** [

building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-08 Thread Peter Maydell
Has anybody had any success in building xfree86 4 for debian/arm? I tried building 4.0.1-10pre11v1 from the source packages at people.debian.org/~branden/woody/ this successfully made it through the process of building binaries and installing them into the debian/tmp directory, but then fell

Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:09:51PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: > # remove the upstream symlink X -> XFree86 > rm /.1/usr/local/src/xfree86-4.0.1/debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/bin/X > rm: cannot remove `/.1/usr/local/src/xfree86-4.0.1/debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/bin/X': No >such file or directory > make: *** [deb

building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-08 Thread Peter Maydell
Has anybody had any success in building xfree86 4 for debian/arm? I tried building 4.0.1-10pre11v1 from the source packages at people.debian.org/~branden/woody/ this successfully made it through the process of building binaries and installing them into the debian/tmp directory, but then fell