Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-11 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Bryan K. Walton wrote: >Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:20:19 -0500 >From: Bryan K. Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: debian-x@lists.debian.org >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0 > >Quick question. Fr

Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-11 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Bryan K. Walton wrote: >Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:20:19 -0500 >From: Bryan K. Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0 > >Quick question. From wh

Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Scott Dier
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020510 11:17]: > On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote: > > Does anyone have any input about what is going on here? Did RedHat > > backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms? Or is something > > wrong with what I am doing?

Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Scott Dier
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020510 11:17]: > On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote: > > Does anyone have any input about what is going on here? Did RedHat > > backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms? Or is something > > wrong with what I am doing?

Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Bryan K. Walton
Thanks Branden! That did it! -Bryan On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:06:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > It may also be possible to get the "ati" driver working with you card > even under 4.1 by specifying the ChipId of a similar supported chipset > in your XF86Config-4 file. -- Bryan K. Walt

Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote: > Does anyone have any input about what is going on here? Did RedHat > backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms? Or is something > wrong with what I am doing? Red Hat's 4.1 RPMs are at least as hacked up as our Debian pac

ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Bryan K. Walton
Quick question. From what I can tell, the ATI Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF AGP video card is not supported by X 4.1.0. It looks like 4.1 was released in June of 2001 and this card was not officially supported by the XFree86 team until July of 2001. I assume that the 4.2 package supports this card. The

Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Bryan K. Walton
Thanks Branden! That did it! -Bryan On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:06:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > It may also be possible to get the "ati" driver working with you card > even under 4.1 by specifying the ChipId of a similar supported chipset > in your XF86Config-4 file. -- Bryan K. Wal

Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote: > Does anyone have any input about what is going on here? Did RedHat > backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms? Or is something > wrong with what I am doing? Red Hat's 4.1 RPMs are at least as hacked up as our Debian pa

ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Bryan K. Walton
Quick question. From what I can tell, the ATI Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF AGP video card is not supported by X 4.1.0. It looks like 4.1 was released in June of 2001 and this card was not officially supported by the XFree86 team until July of 2001. I assume that the 4.2 package supports this card. Th