Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:32:56 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#237878: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 237878 xdm: Xservers file should reflect XFree86 4.0's change from
> -bpp to -depth
Bug#237878: xdm should reflect XFree86 4.0s change from -bpp to -dep
I noticed your posting regarding problems with XFree86 4.0 locking up
on your Thinkpad 240, and spent the last five hours coming up with an
ad-hoc solution. I have no idea what the problem is, but the
following appears to be a minimal set of accelerations to disable to
keep the server from
I noticed your posting regarding problems with XFree86 4.0 locking up
on your Thinkpad 240, and spent the last five hours coming up with an
ad-hoc solution. I have no idea what the problem is, but the
following appears to be a minimal set of accelerations to disable to
keep the server from
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:35:59PM +0100, Ingo Reimann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:35:40PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> What was the problem, just to put libGLU in the package? it contains no
> direct dependency with the nvidia-driver and works fine with it.
>
> but xlibmesa3 should confli
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:35:40PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote / Chris Cheney hat
am Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:35:40PM -0600 geschrieben:
> I uploaded packages for the nVIDIA kernel module and glx driver. The packages
> (...)
>
Thanks for the packages i perhaps should have read the posting BEFORE
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:35:59PM +0100, Ingo Reimann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:35:40PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> What was the problem, just to put libGLU in the package? it contains no
> direct dependency with the nvidia-driver and works fine with it.
>
> but xlibmesa3 should confl
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:35:40PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote / Chris Cheney hat am
Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:35:40PM -0600 geschrieben:
> I uploaded packages for the nVIDIA kernel module and glx driver. The packages
> (...)
>
Thanks for the packages i perhaps should have read the posting BEFOR
Hi,
although I did not check your packages, I am verry happy to see this. It
makes rebuilding my kernel setup a lot easier. Nice job.
It would be nice if you inform this list when you packages provide
libGlu and depend on xlibosmesa.
Thanks
Marcus
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:35:40PM -0600, Chris
Hi,
although I did not check your packages, I am verry happy to see this. It
makes rebuilding my kernel setup a lot easier. Nice job.
It would be nice if you inform this list when you packages provide
libGlu and depend on xlibosmesa.
Thanks
Marcus
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:35:40PM -0600, Chris
I uploaded packages for the nVIDIA kernel module and glx driver. The packages
do not include the actual nVIDIA code though for legal reasons. The kernel
package allows the user to use kernel-package to build the module and the glx
package allows the user to use dpkg-buildpackage to build the driv
I uploaded packages for the nVIDIA kernel module and glx driver. The packages
do not include the actual nVIDIA code though for legal reasons. The kernel
package allows the user to use kernel-package to build the module and the glx
package allows the user to use dpkg-buildpackage to build the dri
I have being using 4.0.x on debian woody with the following hardware +
software setup since Phase2 debs started to show up.
Voodoo 3 2000 (pci) video card
Logitech cordless wheel mouse (ps/2)
Abit KA7 motherboard (RX and TY bios)
Samsung SyncMaster 955SL monitor
2.4.0-test[1,5,6,8,9] kernel
I hav
I have being using 4.0.x on debian woody with the following hardware +
software setup since Phase2 debs started to show up.
Voodoo 3 2000 (pci) video card
Logitech cordless wheel mouse (ps/2)
Abit KA7 motherboard (RX and TY bios)
Samsung SyncMaster 955SL monitor
2.4.0-test[1,5,6,8,9] kernel
I ha
ges,
and may not work at all on your machine. Normally you can find
information at
http://www.debian.org/~branden
but it seems to be down at the moment.
Sean
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 05:07:57PM +0200, Jens M?ller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just a short question: When will XFree86 4.0 be package
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jens Müller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0
>
> On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 18:07:57 Jens Müller wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Just a short question
Hi!
Just a short question: When will XFree86 4.0 be packaged for Debian (woody)? Or
are there
sources where I can already get it?
Jens
ges,
and may not work at all on your machine. Normally you can find
information at
http://www.debian.org/~branden
but it seems to be down at the moment.
Sean
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 05:07:57PM +0200, Jens M?ller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just a short question: When will XFree86 4.0 be package
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jens Müller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0
>
> On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 18:07:57 Jens Müller wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Just a short question
Hi!
Just a short question: When will XFree86 4.0 be packaged for Debian (woody)? Or are
there
sources where I can already get it?
Jens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lookup_variable (ip, var, strlen(var));
} while (s);
It did seem to fix the problem. If someone who understands cppsetup.c
could comment and it turns out that this patch doesn't in fact disable some
feature of cppsetup, I will submit this patch to XFree86.
Anyway, XFree86 4.0 built with
Today's news flash: omitted words can really change the meaning of a sentence.
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:16:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> They're not available yet, so I am sending this message to apprise Debian
> users my fellow developers of the situation.
...users AND my fellow develo
I have been getting a fair amount of mail about this so I thought I would
mail two of the most widely-read lists Debian has. Hopefully folks will
agree with me that XFree86 4.0 support has ramifications for both users and
developers. I don't subscribe to -user, so I will not see replies p
23 matches
Mail list logo
