On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 12:12:13PM -0700, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000910 01:16]:
> > As I understand it, 3rd party modules have to pick a name that isn't
> > already in use by XFree86. Hence "nvidia" instead of XFree86's "nv".
>
> When I installed my matrox-
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 03:16:14AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 02:39:07PM +0200, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> > Is there any plan to split all the drivers into their own package?
>
> Not at this time. I thought about it a long time ago when I first started
> familiarizing
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 12:12:13PM -0700, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000910 01:16]:
> > As I understand it, 3rd party modules have to pick a name that isn't
> > already in use by XFree86. Hence "nvidia" instead of XFree86's "nv".
>
> When I installed my matrox
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 03:16:14AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 02:39:07PM +0200, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> > Is there any plan to split all the drivers into their own package?
>
> Not at this time. I thought about it a long time ago when I first started
> familiarizin
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000910 01:16]:
> As I understand it, 3rd party modules have to pick a name that isn't
> already in use by XFree86. Hence "nvidia" instead of XFree86's "nv".
When I installed my matrox-supplied mga_drv, I had to replace the
XF86-supplied mga_drv. Should some
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000910 01:16]:
> As I understand it, 3rd party modules have to pick a name that isn't
> already in use by XFree86. Hence "nvidia" instead of XFree86's "nv".
When I installed my matrox-supplied mga_drv, I had to replace the
XF86-supplied mga_drv. Should som
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 02:39:07PM +0200, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> Is there any plan to split all the drivers into their own package?
Not at this time. I thought about it a long time ago when I first started
familiarizing myself with the XFree86 4 way of doing things, and rapidly
came to the conc
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 02:39:07PM +0200, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> Is there any plan to split all the drivers into their own package?
Not at this time. I thought about it a long time ago when I first started
familiarizing myself with the XFree86 4 way of doing things, and rapidly
came to the con
Is there any plan to split all the drivers into their own package?
I´m just asking, because it´s likely, that we will have non-free
x-server drivers... Well at least, if non-free still exists (I haven´t
really followed that discussion).
Or there are any other ideas about the nvidia and mga drive
Is there any plan to split all the drivers into their own package?
I´m just asking, because it´s likely, that we will have non-free
x-server drivers... Well at least, if non-free still exists (I haven´t
really followed that discussion).
Or there are any other ideas about the nvidia and mga driv
10 matches
Mail list logo
