On Jun 21, 2002 at 12:33 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:42:06PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > The 4.1 configuration makes the 102 key layout incompatible with the
> > 104 key one. The 4.2 configuration makes the 104 key layout a strict
> > superset of the 102-ke
On Jun 21, 2002 at 12:33 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:42:06PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > The 4.1 configuration makes the 102 key layout incompatible with the
> > 104 key one. The 4.2 configuration makes the 104 key layout a strict
> > superset of the 102-k
Branden Robinson writes:
> 1) I personally don't care, since I remap the funny keys on the bottom
> row to suit my own strange tastes anyway;
> 2) I don't want to subject my users to shock and horror.
> 3) I don't want to deviate gratuitously from upstream practice.
> I'd appreciate input from th
Branden Robinson writes:
> 1) I personally don't care, since I remap the funny keys on the bottom
> row to suit my own strange tastes anyway;
> 2) I don't want to subject my users to shock and horror.
> 3) I don't want to deviate gratuitously from upstream practice.
> I'd appreciate input from t
> the reason I use Alt to bind window-manager commands is that Meta is
> used by Emacs...
The Key Formerly Known As Meta (``Windows'') is now called Super. You
should feel free to bind S-x in your window manager.
> Ew. Well, I guess that if the X people don't care, and Branden
> doesn't care, I
> the reason I use Alt to bind window-manager commands is that Meta is
> used by Emacs...
The Key Formerly Known As Meta (``Windows'') is now called Super. You
should feel free to bind S-x in your window manager.
> Ew. Well, I guess that if the X people don't care, and Branden
> doesn't care,
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:33:43PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I'd appreciate input from the people on this list as to the impact of
> XFree86 4.2 on 2) and 3). Are those goals truly in conflict? Is this
> only a problem for people with buggy window managers? How many Debian
> users use
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:42:06PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> The 4.1 configuration makes the 102 key layout incompatible with the
> 104 key one. The 4.2 configuration makes the 104 key layout a strict
> superset of the 102-key one.
>
> This was discussed in depth on Xpert, and the 4.2 la
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:42:06PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> >> Your window manager is buggy. In 4.2, the ``Alt'' key carries both
> >> Alt and Meta modifiers.
>
> > Yes, as I explained before, I found the source of the bug: X's
> > keymappings changed to
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:33:43PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I'd appreciate input from the people on this list as to the impact of
> XFree86 4.2 on 2) and 3). Are those goals truly in conflict? Is this
> only a problem for people with buggy window managers? How many Debian
> users use
>> Your window manager is buggy. In 4.2, the ``Alt'' key carries both
>> Alt and Meta modifiers.
> Yes, as I explained before, I found the source of the bug: X's
> keymappings changed to be (a) less useful, and (b) different from
> previous versions. I don't see how you think my window-manager i
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:42:06PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> The 4.1 configuration makes the 102 key layout incompatible with the
> 104 key one. The 4.2 configuration makes the 104 key layout a strict
> superset of the 102-key one.
>
> This was discussed in depth on Xpert, and the 4.2 l
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:06:27PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I'm testing the XFree86 4.2 packages, and the first thing I noticed
>(within a few seconds of setting them up) is that none of my keybindings
>work; for instance, the one I use to pop
I'm testing the XFree86 4.2 packages, and the first thing I noticed
(within a few seconds of setting them up) is that none of my keybindings
work; for instance, the one I use to pop up a new xterm (Alt-t) or the
one I use to move windows (Meta-Button1).
A few seconds of experime
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:42:06PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> >> Your window manager is buggy. In 4.2, the ``Alt'' key carries both
> >> Alt and Meta modifiers.
>
> > Yes, as I explained before, I found the source of the bug: X's
> > keymappings changed to
>> Your window manager is buggy. In 4.2, the ``Alt'' key carries both
>> Alt and Meta modifiers.
> Yes, as I explained before, I found the source of the bug: X's
> keymappings changed to be (a) less useful, and (b) different from
> previous versions. I don't see how you think my window-manager
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:06:27PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> I'm testing the XFree86 4.2 packages, and the first thing I noticed
>(within a few seconds of setting them up) is that none of my keybindings
>work; for instance, the one I use to pop
I'm testing the XFree86 4.2 packages, and the first thing I noticed
(within a few seconds of setting them up) is that none of my keybindings
work; for instance, the one I use to pop up a new xterm (Alt-t) or the
one I use to move windows (Meta-Button1).
A few seconds of experim
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 04:20:22PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing the XFree86 4.2 packages, and the first thing I noticed
> (within a few seconds of setting them up) is that none of my keybindings
> work; for instance, the one I use to pop up a new xterm (Alt-t) or the
> on
Hi,
I'm testing the XFree86 4.2 packages, and the first thing I noticed
(within a few seconds of setting them up) is that none of my keybindings
work; for instance, the one I use to pop up a new xterm (Alt-t) or the
one I use to move windows (Meta-Button1).
A few seconds of experimentation
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 04:20:22PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing the XFree86 4.2 packages, and the first thing I noticed
> (within a few seconds of setting them up) is that none of my keybindings
> work; for instance, the one I use to pop up a new xterm (Alt-t) or the
> o
Hi,
I'm testing the XFree86 4.2 packages, and the first thing I noticed
(within a few seconds of setting them up) is that none of my keybindings
work; for instance, the one I use to pop up a new xterm (Alt-t) or the
one I use to move windows (Meta-Button1).
A few seconds of experimentation
22 matches
Mail list logo
