On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:58:21AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Don't try to include files that don't exist in Debian packages. :)
> What do you mean? I did not include a thing, after all its your package.
Please read debian/README. Different things get built for different
architectur
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:58:21AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Don't try to include files that don't exist in Debian packages. :)
> What do you mean? I did not include a thing, after all its your package.
Please read debian/README. Different things get built for different
architectu
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:19:28AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Thank you very much for providing these. I'm very glad to see m68k
> rejoining the bleeding-edge-XFree86 fold.
I've been there all the time, but it took me a while to fix all the build
problems.
> > find: usr/lib/libOSMesa.so: No
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 03:46:47AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hmm, something else seems to be missing. I had to create a MANIFEST, copy at
> http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/x4.0/
> but thats still not enough yet:
Got it.
> find: usr/lib/libOSMesa.so: No such file or directo
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:19:28AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Thank you very much for providing these. I'm very glad to see m68k
> rejoining the bleeding-edge-XFree86 fold.
I've been there all the time, but it took me a while to fix all the build
problems.
> > find: usr/lib/libOSMesa.so: N
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 03:46:47AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hmm, something else seems to be missing. I had to create a MANIFEST, copy at
> http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/x4.0/
> but thats still not enough yet:
Got it.
> find: usr/lib/libOSMesa.so: No such file or direct
Thank you very much for providing these. I'm very glad to see m68k
rejoining the bleeding-edge-XFree86 fold.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:33:49PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
> all that is needed to get X4.0 built on
Thank you very much for providing these. I'm very glad to see m68k
rejoining the bleeding-edge-XFree86 fold.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:33:49PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
> all that is needed to get X4.0 built o
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:33:49PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
> all that is needed to get X4.0 built on m68k. If my machine hadn't crashed
> three times in a row during the install target, I might have tested them
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:33:49PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
> all that is needed to get X4.0 built on m68k. If my machine hadn't crashed
> three times in a row during the install target, I might have tested them
Hi Branden,
can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
all that is needed to get X4.0 built on m68k. If my machine hadn't crashed
three times in a row during the install target, I might have tested them
already. Anyhow, the patches shouldn't do any harm to non-m68k bu
Hi Branden,
can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
all that is needed to get X4.0 built on m68k. If my machine hadn't crashed
three times in a row during the install target, I might have tested them
already. Anyhow, the patches shouldn't do any harm to non-m68k b
12 matches
Mail list logo
