On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:06:57PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote:
> I forwarded that information internaly to my manager about a week ago
> (after a discution with jcristeau), I believe that the message is:
> * If it affects only Debian SGI (as a corporation) will not care and
> treat us as a bunch of nit
I forwarded that information internaly to my manager about a week ago
(after a discution with jcristeau), I believe that the message is:
* If it affects only Debian SGI (as a corporation) will not care and
treat us as a bunch of nitpickers hippies.
(julien sent me a link I can't find now where fe
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:46:30PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:38 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>>>
>>>A long-standing bug which should be thought about is the GL licensing
>>>problem [1]. SGI kindly c
Le dimanche 15 avril 2007 à 22:29 +0200, Brice Goglin a écrit :
> Josip Rodin wrote:
> > BTW, is there any chance that the -ati driver is going to include support
> > for newer cards, the Radeon X series? It's sort of pointless for any newer
> > machine, it won't even start X...
> >
>
> Dave Ai
Josip Rodin wrote:
> BTW, is there any chance that the -ati driver is going to include support
> for newer cards, the Radeon X series? It's sort of pointless for any newer
> machine, it won't even start X...
>
Dave Airlie did some work on R500 last year, but he was waiting for
ATI's approval be
El Sábado, 14 de Abril de 2007, Noah Meyerhans escribió:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > These are a real thorn in our sides. Another issue is the nvidia code
> > obfuscation bug, which we can fix when we get nouveau in to the archive.
> > I'd love to have a ded
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 12:24:24PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> BTW, is there any chance that the -ati driver is going to include support
> for newer cards, the Radeon X series? It's sort of pointless for any newer
> machine, it won't even start X...
The problem is that the newer cards have dramati
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > 1) active probing of video cards to allow a more dynamic setting and
> > resetting of video modes used. This work is mostly complete already
> > (available in experimental xserver-xorg-video-intel, soon to appear in
> > unstable).
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:09:41AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > These are a real thorn in our sides. Another issue is the nvidia code
> > obfuscation bug, which we can fix when we get nouveau in to the archive.
> > I'd love to hav
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> These are a real thorn in our sides. Another issue is the nvidia code
> obfuscation bug, which we can fix when we get nouveau in to the archive.
> I'd love to have a dedicated maintainer for nouveau[0], but right now it's
> looking li
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt enquired:
> > The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
> > release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
> > software packaging teams in Debian first.
> >
> > We w
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:38 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> >A long-standing bug which should be thought about is the GL licensing
> >problem [1]. SGI kindly contributed code for GL support in X, but their
> >licence is no
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt enquired:
>>The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
>>release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
>>software packaging teams in Debian first.
>>
>>We would like t
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt enquired:
> The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
> release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
> software packaging teams in Debian first.
>
> We would like to know which major upstream versions of X.org are
> expected to
Heya,
The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
software packaging teams in Debian first.
We would like to know which major upstream versions of X.org are
expected to be released in the next 24 months and
15 matches
Mail list logo
