On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:31:47AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:09:29PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:47:48PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > > Admin wrote:
> > > > Properly
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:09:29PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:47:48PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > Properly backport fix from XFree86 CVS HEAD for Linux kernel 2.6 header
> > > rate/period
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:11:01AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:09:29PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:47:48PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > Properly backport fix from XFree86 CVS HEAD for Linux kernel 2.6 head
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:09:29PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:47:48PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
> wrote:
> > Properly backport fix from XFree86 CVS HEAD for Linux kernel 2.6 header
> > rate/period problem; initial patch was incomplete.
>
> Does this i
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:47:48PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Properly backport fix from XFree86 CVS HEAD for Linux kernel 2.6 header
> rate/period problem; initial patch was incomplete.
Does this issue apply to the 4.3 branch, as well?
--
Daniel Stone
Author: branden
Date: 2003-11-12 23:47:39 -0500 (Wed, 12 Nov 2003)
New Revision: 765
Modified:
trunk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
Log:
Properly backport fix from XFree86 CVS HEAD for Linux kernel 2.6 header
rate/period problem; initial patch was incomplete.
- debian/patches/000_sto
6 matches
Mail list logo
