El Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 10:38, Nathanael Nerode escribió:
> > Do not forget the gcc-4.0/libvgahw.a bug as well. I would like to
> > ship well-built code in testing. As Eugene stated a couple of days ago,
> > there are spreaded volatile's all along the code, not only in
> > libvgbahw.a
David Martínez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tend to think in testing as in the next stable, so maybe my feelings
> about
> stability are heading my way. Sorry if this clashes with the general
> interest.
Sure but it won't be release until november or december of 2006, probably.
> Do not forget the gcc-4.0/libvgahw.a bug as well. I would like to ship
> well-built code in testing. As Eugene stated a couple of days ago, there are
> spreaded volatile's all along the code, not only in libvgbahw.a.
Yeah. Well, my proposed change to the macros in compiler.h should catc
El Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 00:35, Steve Langasek escribió:
[...]
> xorg-x11 remains a blocker for GNOME and KDE as long as xorg-x11 is not in
> testing. It just ceases to be a blocker for being able to *build* KDE
> packages once it's in the archive on all architectures.
>
> As for the RC bug
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:06:59PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 18:00, David Nusinow escribió:
> > Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of
> > things in -3. -4 is in good shape so far though, so it may be able to go in
> > to te
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:57:01PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> We are currently blocking any graphical package from migrating to testing.
> If we don't get X.Org in to testing, it's going to be a mass migration of
> these things in at once, and I'd rather try to avoid that if possible.
Sorry, "m
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:06:59PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 18:00, David Nusinow escribió:
> > Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of
> > things in -3. -4 is in good shape so far though, so it may be able to go in
> > to te
El Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 18:25, David Nusinow escribió:
> Good point. To be honest, I don't fully understand Branden's numbering
> scheme. Let's go with -4+SVN then, and we'll also borrow a page from the
> debian-installer team, who uses UNRELEASED (rather than
> unstable/experimental/etc) un
El Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 18:00, David Nusinow escribió:
> Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of
> things in -3. -4 is in good shape so far though, so it may be able to go in
> to testing. While I'm tempted to get -5 with your SELinux fix in first, I
> think un
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:00:18PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:25:30AM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote:
> > > +xorg-x11 (6.8.2.dfsg.1-5+SVN) unstable; urgency=low
> > ^^
> >
> > 5+SVN > 5. That should be 4+SVN, probably.
>
> Nope, sadly -4 is in
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:18:39AM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote:
>
> Hello David.
>
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:00:18 -0400
> you wrote:
>
> > > 5+SVN > 5. That should be 4+SVN, probably.
>
> > Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of
> > things in -3. -4 is in good shap
Hello David.
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:00:18 -0400
you wrote:
> > 5+SVN > 5. That should be 4+SVN, probably.
> Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of
> things in -3. -4 is in good shape so far though, so it may be able to
> go in
> to testing. While I'm tempted to g
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:25:30AM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote:
>
> > +xorg-x11 (6.8.2.dfsg.1-5+SVN) unstable; urgency=low
> ^^
>
> 5+SVN > 5. That should be 4+SVN, probably.
Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of
things in -3. -4 is in
> +xorg-x11 (6.8.2.dfsg.1-5+SVN) unstable; urgency=low
^^
5+SVN > 5. That should be 4+SVN, probably.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-07-20 13:39:31 -0500 (Wed, 20 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 385
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Inaugurate changelog for 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 work
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changel
15 matches
Mail list logo
