Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 59 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches

2003-05-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:40:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Damn son, just rip out the rationale and credit, why don'tcha. > > Is this retaliation for the changelog-ectomy I performed? :) Sorry, that whole commit went horribly wrong - I think I did it all in reverse, ugh. Please feel fre

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 59 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches

2003-05-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:55:01AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: > Author: daniel > Date: 2003-05-26 02:54:43 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003) > New Revision: 59 > > Modified: >branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/910_Xserver_RTFF.diff > Log: > Update #910 per Branden's trunk update, which shoul

X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 59 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches

2003-05-26 Thread X Strike Force SVN Admin
Author: daniel Date: 2003-05-26 02:54:43 -0500 (Mon, 26 May 2003) New Revision: 59 Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/910_Xserver_RTFF.diff Log: Update #910 per Branden's trunk update, which should get it building properly with gcc3.3 again (get rid of multi-line string literals). Mo