Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 09:58:01AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > what about the libGLw libraries, i take it Brian Paul also wants them to be > included in the Xfree gl libs. When XFree86 ships libGLw.a, I will include it in xlibmesa-dev. > About non-free driver implementation, i guess a divert or s

Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 09:58:01AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > what about the libGLw libraries, i take it Brian Paul also wants them to be > included in the Xfree gl libs. When XFree86 ships libGLw.a, I will include it in xlibmesa-dev. > About non-free driver implementation, i guess a divert or

Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-24 Thread Branden Robinson
Please reply to the debian-x mailing list, not to me privately. On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 12:32:04PM +0200, Vedran Rodic wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:52:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > There is not yet official Debian policy on this matter, but I'm starting to > > realize we need one.

Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-23 Thread Branden Robinson
Please reply to the debian-x mailing list, not to me privately. On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 12:32:04PM +0200, Vedran Rodic wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:52:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > There is not yet official Debian policy on this matter, but I'm starting to > > realize we need one

Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-22 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:52:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Hope you don't mind if I CC my reply to the Debian X mailing list. > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 12:28:54AM -0700, Terence Ripperda wrote: > > I'm from NVIDIA, working on our 2d/3d drivers. Now that there are XFree86 > > 4.0.1 > >

Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-22 Thread Seth Arnold
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000922 00:00]: > In fact, first analysis leads me to believe that reserving the XFree86 > modules directory for modules shipped by XFree86 might be a good idea. > Completely eliminates the possibility of namespace collision in the > filesystem. Branden, I th

Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-22 Thread Branden Robinson
Hope you don't mind if I CC my reply to the Debian X mailing list. On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 12:28:54AM -0700, Terence Ripperda wrote: > I'm from NVIDIA, working on our 2d/3d drivers. Now that there are XFree86 > 4.0.1 > packages in development, I'm looking at getting some .deb packages together >

Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-22 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:52:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Hope you don't mind if I CC my reply to the Debian X mailing list. > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 12:28:54AM -0700, Terence Ripperda wrote: > > I'm from NVIDIA, working on our 2d/3d drivers. Now that there are XFree86 4.0.1 > > pack

Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-22 Thread Seth Arnold
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000922 00:00]: > In fact, first analysis leads me to believe that reserving the XFree86 > modules directory for modules shipped by XFree86 might be a good idea. > Completely eliminates the possibility of namespace collision in the > filesystem. Branden, I t

Re: X 4.0.1 package requests.

2000-09-21 Thread Branden Robinson
Hope you don't mind if I CC my reply to the Debian X mailing list. On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 12:28:54AM -0700, Terence Ripperda wrote: > I'm from NVIDIA, working on our 2d/3d drivers. Now that there are XFree86 4.0.1 > packages in development, I'm looking at getting some .deb packages together for