eive the error a while after causing it.
To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
It works fine with a normal local X-session, other
tag 181815 + pending
thanks
Sorry this fix didn't make it into 4.2.1-6.
It will be in 4.2.1-7/4.3.0-1.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Software engineering: that part of
Debian GNU/Linux | computer science which is too
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 181815 + pending
Bug#181815: xlibs: Problem with XRenderCompositeText16 in Render extension
Tags were: patch sid upstream
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tag 181815 + pending
thanks
Sorry this fix didn't make it into 4.2.1-6.
It will be in 4.2.1-7/4.3.0-1.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Software engineering: that part of
Debian GNU/Linux | computer science which is too
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 181815 + pending
Bug#181815: xlibs: Problem with XRenderCompositeText16 in Render extension
Tags were: patch sid upstream
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
iling list just
two days ago:
ITO Tsuyoshi says:
While performing some test about Mozilla Bugzilla Bug #187377 [1], I
found that XRenderCompositeText16 function in Render extension does
not draw text as intended when multiple glyphsets are involved in one
call.
According to t
iling list just
two days ago:
ITO Tsuyoshi says:
While performing some test about Mozilla Bugzilla Bug #187377 [1], I
found that XRenderCompositeText16 function in Render extension does
not draw text as intended when multiple glyphsets are involved in one
call.
According to t
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Lambacher, CK wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Malte Cornils sent an email to the debian-x list(text
>included at the end of this message for reference). I am experiencing
>similar problems with the RENDER extension and Sid, most annoyingly and QT
>apps give a mi
Hello,
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Malte Cornils sent an email to the debian-x list(text
included at the end of this message for reference). I am experiencing
similar problems with the RENDER extension and Sid, most annoyingly and QT
apps give a missing RENDER extension warning when they start. Since
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Lambacher, CK wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Malte Cornils sent an email to the debian-x list(text
>included at the end of this message for reference). I am experiencing
>similar problems with the RENDER extension and Sid, most annoyingly and QT
>apps give a mi
Hi!
Regarding my inquiry from a few days ago, the problem went away,
since a Xfree86.org CVS tree checked out recently gave me the Render
extension, so it's kinda obvious that Debian unstable Xfree86
packages aren't synced with the latest CVS, which is what I thougt
anyway.
Thanks, Y
Hi!
Regarding my inquiry from a few days ago, the problem went away,
since a Xfree86.org CVS tree checked out recently gave me the Render
extension, so it's kinda obvious that Debian unstable Xfree86
packages aren't synced with the latest CVS, which is what I thougt
anyway.
Thanks, Y
Hi,
As stated on this and Xfree's Xpert mailing list, X4.0.2 doesn't
have RENDER support for Mach64 (=the non-Radeon non-r128 part of the
ati driver); it got added with patch no. 7[1] right after the
release. There's another patch, #68 that disables the RENDER
extension if shadowf
Hi,
As stated on this and Xfree's Xpert mailing list, X4.0.2 doesn't
have RENDER support for Mach64 (=the non-Radeon non-r128 part of the
ati driver); it got added with patch no. 7[1] right after the
release. There's another patch, #68 that disables the RENDER
extension if shadowf
Jon Pennington wrote:
>
> Is the new render extension to be included in the XFree86 4.0.2 debs?
It's already been in the recent 4.0.1 debs and I don't see a reason for taking
it out now that 4.0.2 is here. ;)
Michel
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student a
Is the new render extension to be included in the XFree86 4.0.2 debs?
--
-=|JP|=-"Why, oh, why didn't I take the blue pill?"
Jon Pennington| Atipa Linux Solutions -o)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.atipa.com/\\
Kansas City, MO, USA | 816-595-3000
Jon Pennington wrote:
>
> Is the new render extension to be included in the XFree86 4.0.2 debs?
It's already been in the recent 4.0.1 debs and I don't see a reason for taking
it out now that 4.0.2 is here. ;)
Michel
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student a
Is the new render extension to be included in the XFree86 4.0.2 debs?
--
-=|JP|=-"Why, oh, why didn't I take the blue pill?"
Jon Pennington| Atipa Linux Solutions -o)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.atipa.com/\\
Kansas City, MO, USA | 816-595-3000
18 matches
Mail list logo
