Re: success with ct65554

2000-11-17 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > Congratulations! I'm happy to hear that you got success. > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on "Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:33:39 -0500", with "success with ct65554 ", > "Thomas R. Shemanske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > trs> For the record, it seems unneccessary to use modeli

Re: success with ct65554

2000-11-17 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > Congratulations! I'm happy to hear that you got success. > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on "Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:33:39 -0500", with "success with ct65554 ", > "Thomas R. Shemanske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > trs> For the record, it seems unneccessary to use model

Re: success with ct65554

2000-11-17 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Congratulations! I'm happy to hear that you got success. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:33:39 -0500", with "success with ct65554 ", "Thomas R. Shemanske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: trs> For the record, it seems unneccessary to use modelines, FPClock, or trs> DacSpeed. All of

Re: success with ct65554

2000-11-17 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Congratulations! I'm happy to hear that you got success. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:33:39 -0500", with "success with ct65554 ", "Thomas R. Shemanske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: trs> For the record, it seems unneccessary to use modelines, FPClock, or trs> DacSpeed. All o