On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 10:48:13PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 22:43]:
> > Let me know if this works out, and I will babysit XFree86 builds for m68k
> > myself, using the recently-donated G3.
>
> Well, I wasn't thinking of emulating one of those old m
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 10:48:13PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 22:43]:
> > Let me know if this works out, and I will babysit XFree86 builds for m68k
> > myself, using the recently-donated G3.
>
> Well, I wasn't thinking of emulating one of those old
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:35:36PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> If you mean Egbert, I guess he's at least as busy as Branden. :)
Probably. At least Branden bounces the mail to somebody who has the time to
write "READ THE FAQ DAMNIT"
> Not so sure. I have such a machine here, and a BuildServon
"Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:53:52AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > Ben Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
>
> > > > Could a cross-compile environment bring this down? Is there any *need*
> > > > to compile
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:35:36PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> If you mean Egbert, I guess he's at least as busy as Branden. :)
Probably. At least Branden bounces the mail to somebody who has the time to
write "READ THE FAQ DAMNIT"
> Not so sure. I have such a machine here, and a BuildServo
"Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:53:52AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > Ben Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
>
> > > > Could a cross-compile environment bring this down? Is there any *need*
> > > > to compile
Don't drink and derive... anyway, a few comments on this thread.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:53:52AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > > Could a cross-compile environment bring this down? Is there any *need*
>
Don't drink and derive... anyway, a few comments on this thread.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:53:52AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > > Could a cross-compile environment bring this down? Is there any *need*
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 22:43]:
> Let me know if this works out, and I will babysit XFree86 builds for m68k
> myself, using the recently-donated G3.
Well, I wasn't thinking of emulating one of those old machines -- I was
thinking of setting up gcc to know about the processor
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 12:28:54AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Here comes the new MANIFEST for m68k, I hope its not too late.
>
> Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
> need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
Here it comes where? There was no MIME
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 07:25:23PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > * Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> > > Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long
> > > I
> > > need _at least_
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 22:43]:
> Let me know if this works out, and I will babysit XFree86 builds for m68k
> myself, using the recently-donated G3.
Well, I wasn't thinking of emulating one of those old machines -- I was
thinking of setting up gcc to know about the processo
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 12:28:54AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Here comes the new MANIFEST for m68k, I hope its not too late.
>
> Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
> need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
Here it comes where? There was no MIM
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 07:25:23PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > * Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> > > Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
> > > need _at least_ to get
Ben Collins wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > * Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> > > Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how
> > > long I need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
> >
> > Could a cross-
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> > Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
> > need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
>
> Could a cross-compile environment bring this do
* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
> need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
Could a cross-compile environment bring this down? Is there any *need*
to compile these things on an m68k? I imagine t
Ben Collins wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > * Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> > > Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how
> > > long I need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
> >
> > Could a cross
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> > Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
> > need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
>
> Could a cross-compile environment bring this d
* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
> need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
Could a cross-compile environment bring this down? Is there any *need*
to compile these things on an m68k? I imagine
20 matches
Mail list logo
