Charl P. Botha wrote:
> It's not always the desired solution. Some keyboards _do_ have separate
> META keys and always binding meta to alt would be very rude. The same goes
> for binding escape to meta.
Ok. But rxvt or gnome-terminal for example work out-of-the-box. I'll
try to find out what th
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:41:25PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
> > first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
> > Thomas Dickey.
>
> I meant the second one. If the
Charl P. Botha wrote:
> Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
> first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
> Thomas Dickey.
I meant the second one. If the first one is a working solution, can't
it (or anonther solution) be integrated
Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
Thomas Dickey.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:17:43PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Tor Slettnes wrote:
> > Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I
Tor Slettnes wrote:
> Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I need to set the X
> Charl> resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true and to do xmodmap -e
> Charl> "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key combinations
> Charl> to work in an xterm, e.g. on the command-line (e.g. alt
Charl P. Botha wrote:
> It's not always the desired solution. Some keyboards _do_ have separate
> META keys and always binding meta to alt would be very rude. The same goes
> for binding escape to meta.
Ok. But rxvt or gnome-terminal for example work out-of-the-box. I'll
try to find out what t
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:41:25PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
> > first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
> > Thomas Dickey.
>
> I meant the second one. If the
Charl P. Botha wrote:
> Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
> first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
> Thomas Dickey.
I meant the second one. If the first one is a working solution, can't
it (or anonther solution) be integrate
Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
Thomas Dickey.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:17:43PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Tor Slettnes wrote:
> > Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment,
Tor Slettnes wrote:
> Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I need to set the X
> Charl> resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true and to do xmodmap -e
> Charl> "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key combinations
> Charl> to work in an xterm, e.g. on the command-line (e.g. al
> "Charl" == Charl P Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I need to set the X
Charl> resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true and to do xmodmap -e
Charl> "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key combinations
Charl> to work in an xterm, e.
> "Charl" == Charl P Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charl> Dear Debian-Xers, At the moment, I need to set the X
Charl> resource xterm*metaSendsEscape to true and to do xmodmap -e
Charl> "keysym Alt_L = Meta_L Alt_L" to get Alt+key combinations
Charl> to work in an xterm, e
12 matches
Mail list logo
