On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:09:54PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:38:05PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > The input code is used only for the USB support. If we want to keep
> > that, we're going to have to make it build. What I would do:
> > - #undef the necessa
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:09:54PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:38:05PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > The input code is used only for the USB support. If we want to keep
> > that, we're going to have to make it build. What I would do:
> > - #undef the necess
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:38:05PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> The input code is used only for the USB support. If we want to keep
> that, we're going to have to make it build. What I would do:
> - #undef the necessary constants until it compiles
> - #define HasLinuxInput ON explicitly
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:38:05PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> The input code is used only for the USB support. If we want to keep
> that, we're going to have to make it build. What I would do:
> - #undef the necessary constants until it compiles
> - #define HasLinuxInput ON explicitl
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:47:16AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:00:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > However, unfortunately, some things in the XFree86 tree (the Wacom input
> > module, at least) build differently on kernel 2.4 systems than they do on
> > 2.2 sy
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:47:16AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:00:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > However, unfortunately, some things in the XFree86 tree (the Wacom input
> > module, at least) build differently on kernel 2.4 systems than they do on
> > 2.2 s
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:00:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> However, unfortunately, some things in the XFree86 tree (the Wacom input
> module, at least) build differently on kernel 2.4 systems than they do on
> 2.2 systems. More to the point, building xf86Wacom.c flat out fails on 2.4
>
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:00:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> However, unfortunately, some things in the XFree86 tree (the Wacom input
> module, at least) build differently on kernel 2.4 systems than they do on
> 2.2 systems. More to the point, building xf86Wacom.c flat out fails on 2.4
8 matches
Mail list logo