Re: X11R6.7

2004-05-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:32:36PM +0200, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote: > El Martes, 13 de Abril de 2004 22:59, Keith Packard escribi?: > > Around 15 o'clock on Apr 13, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I think it might be easier to transition our developers and users if we > > > packaged the X.Org mono

Re: X11R6.7

2004-05-17 Thread David Martínez Moreno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Martes, 13 de Abril de 2004 22:59, Keith Packard escribió: > Around 15 o'clock on Apr 13, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I think it might be easier to transition our developers and users if we > > packaged the X.Org monolithic tree, adding stuff from m

Re: X11R6.7

2004-04-14 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 10:44:46PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:16:03PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I think it might be easier to transition our developers and users if we > > packaged the X.Org monolithic tree, adding stuff from modular tree in > > parallel as it

Re: X11R6.7

2004-04-14 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:16:03PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I think it might be easier to transition our developers and users if we > packaged the X.Org monolithic tree, adding stuff from modular tree in > parallel as it becomes available. I suppose that the current packaging would transit

Re: X11R6.7

2004-04-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Keith Packard wrote: > Around 15 o'clock on Apr 13, Branden Robinson wrote: > >> I think it might be easier to transition our developers and users if we >> packaged the X.Org monolithic tree, adding stuff from modular tree in >> parallel as it becomes available. > > That depends to some degree o

Re: X11R6.7

2004-04-13 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:16:03PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 08:26:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 08:42:50AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > Hopefully this is no oh-no-not-again question: > > > > > > What happens after XFree86 4.3? I un

Re: X11R6.7

2004-04-13 Thread Keith Packard
Around 15 o'clock on Apr 13, Branden Robinson wrote: > I think it might be easier to transition our developers and users if we > packaged the X.Org monolithic tree, adding stuff from modular tree in > parallel as it becomes available. That depends to some degree on whether I manage to convince t

Re: X11R6.7

2004-04-13 Thread Branden Robinson
[Harald, are you subscribed to debian-x? If so, I apologize for CCing you.] On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 08:26:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 08:42:50AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > Hopefully this is no oh-no-not-again question: > > > > What happens after XFree86 4.3? I

Re: X11R6.7

2004-04-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 08:42:50AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hopefully this is no oh-no-not-again question: > > What happens after XFree86 4.3? I understand that you don't > like the license of version 4.4. Is X11R6.7 a better choice? None of us have plans to package the X.Org monolithic tre