Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
>> And in 2.6.31-rc6, KMS is not stable enought to be used for my day-to-day
>> work. It even leads to data corruption. See #545517
>> Since I remove KMS (ie since my bug report), I had no problem at all
>> (w
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> And in 2.6.31-rc6, KMS is not stable enought to be used for my day-to-day
> work. It even leads to data corruption. See #545517
> Since I remove KMS (ie since my bug report), I had no problem at all
> (with many many suspend-resume c
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> >> their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
>> their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
>> we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pic
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 18:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> [ Remove -release, this is technical stuff. ]
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:31:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Is KMS backward compatible with older versions of the i
[ Remove -release, this is technical stuff. ]
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:31:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Is KMS backward compatible with older versions of the intel driver?
> No :/
What happens when a old driver runs on a KMS
Le mercredi 09 septembre 2009 à 14:04 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> If not at X side, is it a possibility to either (a) add the new memory
> manager to lenny (I assume not), or (b) tell the users "you need to
> upgrade your kernel first" (and make the new X pre-depending somehow
> on the kernel
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 14:42:52 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > > their Q4 2009 release (mea
* Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) [090909 12:37]:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
> > we'll want for squeeze, dep
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
> > we'll want for s
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
> we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pick).
Oh, no. Not again. It
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When
> should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
>
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (mean
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 16:06:13 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> What's the status about this? When do you think the X stack will be
> ready to migrate?
>
Currently the only blocker as far as I know is the fact that
xserver-xorg-video-intel locks up shortly after X startup on 865G chips.
I'm confident
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
>> * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should
>> those
>> happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
>>
> Lately the big problems were related to the stability of the in
David Nusinow wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>> [other xsf members, feel free to chime in if I'm forgetting something or
>> saying something stupid :)]
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
>>
>>
>>> * Which major upstream releases of X.org are expected in the ne
Julien Cristau wrote:
[other xsf members, feel free to chime in if I'm forgetting something or
saying something stupid :)]
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
* Which major upstream releases of X.org are expected in the next two
years? Which of those are mate
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 13:23 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
>
> > * Which major upstream releases of X.org are expected in the next two
> > years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit
> > flaky?
[other xsf members, feel free to chime in if I'm forgetting something or
saying something stupid :)]
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> * Which major upstream releases of X.org are expected in the next two
> years? Which of those are material for Debian stable,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:06:57PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote:
> I forwarded that information internaly to my manager about a week ago
> (after a discution with jcristeau), I believe that the message is:
> * If it affects only Debian SGI (as a corporation) will not care and
> treat us as a bunch of nit
I forwarded that information internaly to my manager about a week ago
(after a discution with jcristeau), I believe that the message is:
* If it affects only Debian SGI (as a corporation) will not care and
treat us as a bunch of nitpickers hippies.
(julien sent me a link I can't find now where fe
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:46:30PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:38 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>>>
>>>A long-standing bug which should be thought about is the GL licensing
>>>problem [1]. SGI kindly c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 461783 grave
Bug#461783: X.org segfaults all the time since last update
Bug#462243: x11-xkb-utils: calling setxkbmap crashes X server
Bug#463194: xserver-xorg-core: crashes setting keyboard layout
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> tha
El Sábado, 14 de Abril de 2007, Noah Meyerhans escribió:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > These are a real thorn in our sides. Another issue is the nvidia code
> > obfuscation bug, which we can fix when we get nouveau in to the archive.
> > I'd love to have a ded
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 12:24:24PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> BTW, is there any chance that the -ati driver is going to include support
> for newer cards, the Radeon X series? It's sort of pointless for any newer
> machine, it won't even start X...
The problem is that the newer cards have dramati
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > 1) active probing of video cards to allow a more dynamic setting and
> > resetting of video modes used. This work is mostly complete already
> > (available in experimental xserver-xorg-video-intel, soon to appear in
> > unstable).
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:09:41AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > These are a real thorn in our sides. Another issue is the nvidia code
> > obfuscation bug, which we can fix when we get nouveau in to the archive.
> > I'd love to hav
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> These are a real thorn in our sides. Another issue is the nvidia code
> obfuscation bug, which we can fix when we get nouveau in to the archive.
> I'd love to have a dedicated maintainer for nouveau[0], but right now it's
> looking li
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt enquired:
> > The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
> > release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
> > software packaging teams in Debian first.
> >
> > We w
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:38 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> >A long-standing bug which should be thought about is the GL licensing
> >problem [1]. SGI kindly contributed code for GL support in X, but their
> >licence is no
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt enquired:
>>The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
>>release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
>>software packaging teams in Debian first.
>>
>>We would like t
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt enquired:
> The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
> release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
> software packaging teams in Debian first.
>
> We would like to know which major upstream versions of X.org are
> expected to
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:41:41AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > commit b25f4dfbbd86e21146d1f9121c29d48e0c3a2678
> > Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue Nov 21 21:52:28 2006 -0500
> >
> > Add quilt as a build-depend
>
> I
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> commit b25f4dfbbd86e21146d1f9121c29d48e0c3a2678
> Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue Nov 21 21:52:28 2006 -0500
>
> Add quilt as a build-depend
I've been using git for sometime to maintain our specific patches of
debian packages
> Are there any approximate dates as to when X.Org 7.1 would hit unstable ?
It's already underway. The transition will likely be complete within the
fortnight.
Drew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:53:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I rebuilt the 6.9RC0 tree with the attached patch, which gave me the
> following MANIFEST diff:
>
Hi,
please find attached the MANIFEST.alpha diff for xorg-x11
6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-1 (still with the patch I sent with the previ
Hi,
please find attached the MANIFEST diff for sparc, for xorg-x11 6.9RC1.
Cheers,
Julien Cristau
--- debian/MANIFEST.sparc 2005-10-22 01:15:03.0 +
+++ debian/MANIFEST.sparc.new 2005-10-22 01:15:03.0 +
@@ -92 +91,0 @@
-etc/X11/xkb/compat/group_led
@@ -96 +95,3 @@
-
Hi,
I rebuilt the 6.9RC0 tree with the attached patch, which gave me the
following MANIFEST diff:
--- debian/MANIFEST.alpha 2005-10-22 00:25:25.0 +
+++ debian/MANIFEST.alpha.new 2005-10-22 00:25:25.0 +
@@ -18,2 +17,0 @@
-etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm
-etc/X11/app
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Once you build it, either post the log somewhere or send the diff at the
> end (it'll be a diff of MANIFEST files) to debian-x. I've set the m-f-t to
> debian-x, so you can just reply to this mail if it suits you. Thanks to
> everyone for helping get Xor
On Sat, Oct 8, 2005 at 00:25:57 +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just tried to build xorg-x11 from current svn on alpha.
> > It failed in xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/dri/r128/r128_ioctl.c, with what
> > looks like a missing #include somewhere. I don't h
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just tried to build xorg-x11 from current svn on alpha.
> It failed in xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/dri/r128/r128_ioctl.c, with what
> looks like a missing #include somewhere. I don't have the time to
> investigate right now, but will look into it next week
Hi David,
David Nusinow wrote:
> Once you build it, either post the log somewhere or send the diff at the
> end (it'll be a diff of MANIFEST files) to debian-x.
Building from the subversion source on powerpc (ibook) gives this :
diff MANIFEST.powerpc MANIFEST.powerpc.new
1249a1250
> usr/X11R6/
Hi,
I just tried to build xorg-x11 from current svn on alpha.
It failed in xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/dri/r128/r128_ioctl.c, with what
looks like a missing #include somewhere. I don't have the time to
investigate right now, but will look into it next week if noone does it
first.
Build log is available
El Jueves, 4 de Agosto de 2005 20:12, David Nusinow escribió:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 07:27:02PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> > Hello to all. I have built 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4+SVN, with an snapshot from
> > yesterday, and additionally with a backport of Savage driver from HEAD.
> > The URL
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 07:27:02PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> Hello to all. I have built 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4+SVN, with an snapshot from
> yesterday, and additionally with a backport of Savage driver from HEAD. The
> URL for the packages is:
Why don't you commit the backported driver?
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 12:49:09AM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 11:52 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:17:02PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > X.org HEAD was switched to build dlloader by default a while ago, so
> > > it'll be like that in 6.9/7.0.
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 11:52 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:17:02PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > X.org HEAD was switched to build dlloader by default a while ago, so
> > it'll be like that in 6.9/7.0. That said, I don't know if or how well
> > dlloader works on all the ar
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:51:29AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:57:47PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Also, how much work would it take to move to dlloader wholesale?
>
> A reasonable amount, plus breaking all external drivers (Synaptics, ATI,
> nVidia) until it gets s
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:17:02PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> X.org HEAD was switched to build dlloader by default a while ago, so
> it'll be like that in 6.9/7.0. That said, I don't know if or how well
> dlloader works on all the architectures, but I'd expect it to be more
> portable than elflo
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:57:47PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:00:07AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:02:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > XSF, can we switch to using dlloader on alpha? Pleese? :)
> >
> > It does not make sense to
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:42:06PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 15:35 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> >
> > Ok, perhaps our best interests are served by getting 6.9/7.0 in to Debian
> > as fast as possible once it's released. I'd rather spend energy on that
> > than patching u
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 15:35 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> Ok, perhaps our best interests are served by getting 6.9/7.0 in to Debian
> as fast as possible once it's released. I'd rather spend energy on that
> than patching up 6.8 to make it a sorta-6.9.
I agree. Maybe start by packaging the upco
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:17:02PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 13:57 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:00:07AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:02:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > XSF, can we switch to using dlload
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 13:57 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:00:07AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:02:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > XSF, can we switch to using dlloader on alpha? Pleese? :)
> >
> > It does not make sense to do this
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:00:07AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:02:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > XSF, can we switch to using dlloader on alpha? Pleese? :)
>
> It does not make sense to do this for one architecture only.
>
> I'd suggest that until we move to
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:02:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> XSF, can we switch to using dlloader on alpha? Pleese? :)
It does not make sense to do this for one architecture only.
I'd suggest that until we move to dlloader wholesale, alpha joins hppa,
mips*, m68k, sh*, etc in using a st
Followup:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:49:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:29:31PM -0400, jacob wrote:
> > Greetings all.
> > Today with a day of mixed blessings. I was over-joyed to see X.org
> > finally make into the Alpha/Sid. However, no amount of convolutions by
* Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Setting up xfree86-common (6.8.2.dfsg.1-0pre1v1) ...
> update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/xfree86-common exists during rc.d purge (use -f to
> force)
> dpkg: error processing xfree86-common (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Zoe Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just upgraded to them from the repository as mentioned in David's
> Blog and it seemed to go without a hitch apart from getting a message
> about how /etc/init.d/xfree86-common existed during purge.
I've installed the packages too, and they work perfect
I have one question about X.org: in any X.org based distribution I've ever
tried setting more than one keyboard layouts under GNOME fails with some kind
of error messages or if the messages are ingnored it's type symbols instead
of a normal letters it should type and the second layout is invisib
On Saturday 25 June 2005 13:00, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Zoe Parsons wrote:
> > I just upgraded to them from the repository as mentioned in David's Blog
> > and it seemed to go without a hitch apart from getting a message about
> > how /etc/init.d/xfree86-common existed during purge.
> >
> > So tha
Zoe Parsons wrote:
> I just upgraded to them from the repository as mentioned in David's Blog
> and it seemed to go without a hitch apart from getting a message about how
> /etc/init.d/xfree86-common existed during purge.
>
> So that's one happy bunny over here if nowhere else. :-)
>
> Now just
Upgraded to the xorg packages by including repositories mentioned on
http://www.livejournal.com/users/gravityboy/
I earlier had the xorg packages from ubuntu. The upgrade was
problematic and had to resolve many conflicts (x11-proto*) and others.
But I finally have the debian xorg packages.
No probl
On Friday 24 June 2005 21:07, Zoe Parsons wrote:
> I just upgraded to them from the repository as mentioned in David's Blog
> and it seemed to go without a hitch apart from getting a message about how
> /etc/init.d/xfree86-common existed during purge.
Setting up xfree86-common (6.8.2.dfsg.1-0pre
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 02:20:28PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> Do you
> think you could push your autotool server tree in to your public arch repo
> where you keep debrix so I could take a look at it? I'd be willing to work,
> at least on the X server, on packages from both the monolithic and mod
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:52:41PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > "david" == David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> david> So are you saying you want to import each file
> david> individually? We could do that, where when you import a
> david> file, you basically say "I've c
> "david" == David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
david> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:10:42PM -0300, Otavio Salvador
david> wrote:
>> Since we'll review all changes made by Ubuntu makes more sense
>> to me do it while import it from his repository. This make
>> simple fo
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:10:42PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Since we'll review all changes made by Ubuntu makes more sense to
> me do it while import it from his repository. This make simple for
> us and for users use a know base to work.
So are you saying you want to import eac
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:38:09PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 06:45:58PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > 1) Import Ubuntu packaging for X.org in to our svn repo wholesale. Whether
> > this should be from the Hoary release package, or the most recent
> > develpomen
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:02:29PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> X11R7 will release on August 19th; the protocol headers and libraries
> are basically done today. The architecture for the server is fine, and
> I've been tweaking things until they work, but it will need a reasonable
> amount of port
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:38:09PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> As always, you know my email address if you need to ask questions, but
> at this stage, the effort is utterly uninteresting to me, due to the
> fact I'm not allowed to get involved in any meaningful way. I'll keep
> on playing in my o
> "daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
daniel> I've been working upstream on the modular tree on my week
daniel> off, and the libs are done, and the server is well on the
daniel> way.
>> How far we currently are from modular tree? If it's not so
>> far, co
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 11:46:49PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > "daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> daniel> Another interesting question is what to do with version
> daniel> numbers, since 6.8.2-1 will suddenly become ambiguous.
>
> Well, one possible soluti
> "daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
daniel> Another interesting question is what to do with version
daniel> numbers, since 6.8.2-1 will suddenly become ambiguous.
Well, one possible solution could be use 6.8.2.debian-1 as version.
>> 3) Make sure they build
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 06:45:58PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> 1) Import Ubuntu packaging for X.org in to our svn repo wholesale. Whether
> this should be from the Hoary release package, or the most recent
> develpoment tree, I don't know, and I'd like to hear from Daniel on
> wh
> "david" == David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
david> I'd like to hammer out a roadmap for getting X.org packages
david> ready to go. Feedback from everyone is critical, of
david> course. Here's what I've got so far:
david> 1) Import Ubuntu packaging for X.org in to
Il giorno gio, 10-02-2005 alle 12:09 +1100, Daniel Stone ha scritto:
> Cache the output of either lspci -n | grep 'Class (280|300)' or
> discover; if a) X fails to start, and b) the configuration has changed,
> have ?dm throw up a Debconf prompt saying 'I think your hardware has
> changed, should
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:52:25AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> i want to talk to you about a problem in x.org/xserver.
> When a newbie user change the video card or some other sensible
> component - like monitor - caused by a component crash or simply by an
> hardware upgrade Xfree and X.org in debi
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 01:51:47PM +, ROBERTOJIMENOCA wrote:
> I need xorg packages for Debian to continue development of xorg
> integration in Debian.
>
> I can't continue development of xfree86 integration in Debian because I
> don't know if the problem in already fixed in xorg and I don't w
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:00:26AM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Uhm... correction: Xprint is part of the Xorg release, starting with
> X11R6.8.0 both trees are identical (before that Xprint was already part
> of X11 (since X11R6.4) but the plain X.org version was pretty much
> unuseable since the s
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 12:10:10AM +, ROBERTOJIMENOCA wrote:
> > I saw this post on slashdot.org:
> > http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=121015&cid=10187780
> > This isn't funny.
> >
> > Do you have any roadmap to have x.org Debian packages?
> > How may
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 12:10:10AM +, ROBERTOJIMENOCA wrote:
> I saw this post on slashdot.org:
> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=121015&cid=10187780
> This isn't funny.
>
> Do you have any roadmap to have x.org Debian packages?
> How may I help?
You may be interested in the la
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, ROBERTOJIMENOCA wrote:
> I saw this post on slashdot.org:
> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=121015&cid=10187780
> This isn't funny.
Who wrote these comments didn't bother to read any of the mail on debian-x
and just did some assumptions.
> Do you have any road
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 10:27:52PM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> Is Debian going to switch to X.org?
>
> This Slashdot article says Slackware is:
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/31/2317246&mode=nested&tid=104&tid=106&tid=185&tid=189
>
> Ananamous Coward writes "Some big distros had a
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:51:03PM +0300, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Is there any plans to replace XFree86 with XOrg
> (http://freedesktop.org/Software/xorg), which is actually a fork of
> XFree 4.4 with free licence.
>
> Sorry for my english. Bye.
No, but there are plans to replace it with freedes
85 matches
Mail list logo
