#include
* Branden Robinson [Mon, Jan 27 2003, 12:15:04PM]:
> > > > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > > > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > > > no faulty decissions ruled by semi-technical (but personal) problems.
#include
* Branden Robinson [Mon, Jan 27 2003, 12:15:04PM]:
> > > > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > > > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > > > no faulty decissions ruled by semi-technical (but personal) problems.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:11:33PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Branden Robinson [Sun, Jan 26 2003, 04:18:09PM]:
>
> > > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > > no faul
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:11:33PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Branden Robinson [Sun, Jan 26 2003, 04:18:09PM]:
>
> > > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > > no faul
#include
* Branden Robinson [Sun, Jan 26 2003, 04:18:09PM]:
> > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > no faulty decissions ruled by semi-technical (but personal) problems.
>
> This m
#include
* Branden Robinson [Sun, Jan 26 2003, 04:18:09PM]:
> > What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
> > Our Users and Free Software, see Social Contract. Not personal warfares,
> > no faulty decissions ruled by semi-technical (but personal) problems.
>
> This m
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:12:20PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Branden Robinson [Tue, Jan 21 2003, 01:27:13PM]:
>
> > I don't know why you expect help from this list after exhibiting the
> > attitude you did in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> What is your problem with my attit
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:12:20PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Branden Robinson [Tue, Jan 21 2003, 01:27:13PM]:
>
> > I don't know why you expect help from this list after exhibiting the
> > attitude you did in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> What is your problem with my attit
#include
* Branden Robinson [Tue, Jan 21 2003, 01:27:13PM]:
> I don't know why you expect help from this list after exhibiting the
> attitude you did in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
Our Users and Free Software, see Social
#include
* Branden Robinson [Tue, Jan 21 2003, 01:27:13PM]:
> I don't know why you expect help from this list after exhibiting the
> attitude you did in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
What is your problem with my attitude? As said before, my Priority are
Our Users and Free Software, see Social
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:35:31PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I tried this with Sid version, Brandens preview packages and Daniels
> development tree. In all cases, I noticed a significantly high
> (gigantic) CPU usage when applications tried to load the Unicode
> equivalents of their fonts. For
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:35:31PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I tried this with Sid version, Brandens preview packages and Daniels
> development tree. In all cases, I noticed a significantly high
> (gigantic) CPU usage when applications tried to load the Unicode
> equivalents of their fonts. For
12 matches
Mail list logo
