On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 11:11:46AM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, David Nusinow wrote:
>>
>>> Potential Issues:
>>> What we can assume from all this is that the drivers will call DDC on
>>> their
>>> own, so why should we care abou
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, David Nusinow wrote:
Potential Issues:
What we can assume from all this is that the drivers will call DDC on
their
own, so why should we care about having xresprobe do it during the install?
Indeed, I've checked over several of t
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, David Nusinow wrote:
Potential Issues:
What we can assume from all this is that the drivers will call DDC on their
own, so why should we care about having xresprobe do it during the install?
Indeed, I've checked over several of the drivers and almost all of them
do use the D
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 01:48:27PM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:34:34PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > One issue is that sometimes the monitor will fail to do a proper
> > DDC on one occasion, but succeed on another.
>
> I saw this happening when I was doing some la
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:34:34PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> One issue is that sometimes the monitor will fail to do a proper
> DDC on one occasion, but succeed on another.
I saw this happening when I was doing some laptop/projector testing a
few weeks ago. It seemed that sometimes it'd retur
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 06:48:19PM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:47:27PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> >I've been spewing my random findings in to the irc channel for a few
> > days now but I think it's time I posted a summary of where things stand on
> > getting r
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 08:45:26AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> David Nusinow wrote:
> > Potential Issues:
> > What we can assume from all this is that the drivers will call DDC on
> > their
> > own, so why should we care about having xresprobe do it during the install?
> > Indeed, I've checked
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:47:27PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>I've been spewing my random findings in to the irc channel for a few
> days now but I think it's time I posted a summary of where things stand on
> getting rid of xresprobe. Please do provide corrections, commentary, and
> question
David Nusinow wrote:
> Potential Issues:
> What we can assume from all this is that the drivers will call DDC on their
> own, so why should we care about having xresprobe do it during the install?
> Indeed, I've checked over several of the drivers and almost all of them
> do use the DDC informati
9 matches
Mail list logo
