On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 20:42:51 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 05:43:30PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 19:37 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > The linux kernel is source of the drm headers in the meantime.
> > It *is*, but it shouldn't be. Let's fi
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 05:43:30PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 19:37 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The linux kernel is source of the drm headers in the meantime.
> It *is*, but it shouldn't be. Let's fix this now.
Ah. So libdrm still works if we remove the drm drivers as
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 19:37 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> reassign 572067 libdrm-dev
> thanks
>
> The linux kernel is source of the drm headers in the meantime.
It *is*, but it shouldn't be. Let's fix this now.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The most exhausting thing in life is being insincere. - Anne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 572067 libdrm-dev
Bug #572067 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev: Can not install, file conflict
with libdrm
Bug #572592 [linux-libc-dev] libdrm-dev: /usr/include/drm/nouveau_drm.h belongs
to linux-libc-dev since 2.6.33
Bug reassigned from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 572592 linux-libc-dev
Bug #572592 [libdrm-dev] libdrm-dev: /usr/include/drm/nouveau_drm.h belongs to
linux-libc-dev since 2.6.33
Bug reassigned from package 'libdrm-dev' to 'linux-libc-dev'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions libd
5 matches
Mail list logo