On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 06:30:23AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Well, the scope of this discussion is a pair of manpages, xdm.options(5)
> > and xfs.options(5).
> >
> > Do you object to me documenting invoke-rc.d there instead of
> > /et
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Well, the scope of this discussion is a pair of manpages, xdm.options(5)
> and xfs.options(5).
>
> Do you object to me documenting invoke-rc.d there instead of
> /etc/init.d?
Both arguments are valid imho and perhaps we can document both underlining
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:48:36AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > IIRC, you generally want to use invoke-rc.d because it is cognizant of
> > runlevel policy (i.e., start service $FOO in runlevel 3 but not runlevel
> > 2, and so forth).
>
> That's true of maintainer scripts,
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:07:14AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > > People shouldn't run "/etc/init.d/$SCRIPT" anymore; they should use
> > > "invoke-rc.d $SCRIPT" instead.
> > >
> > > There have been many threads on -devel about this.
> >
> > if they were insid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 145746 xlibs
Bug#145746: libx11-6: select() hangs in XDrawString16() when using TrueType
with Xinerama
Bug#147898: xlibs: select() hangs in XDrawString16() when using TrueType with
Xinerama
Bug reassigned from package `libx11-6' to `xlibs'.
reassign 145746 xlibs
reassign 147898 xlibs
close 145746
close 147898
merge 145746 147898 191463
thanks
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:25:44AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:27:17AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > >From the TODO list, the following fixes should be
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:07:14AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > People shouldn't run "/etc/init.d/$SCRIPT" anymore; they should use
> > "invoke-rc.d $SCRIPT" instead.
> >
> > There have been many threads on -devel about this.
>
> if they were inside flamewars than i didn't read it for
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Well, no, the idea is simply that we take advantage of defoma if it is
> installed, since we can trust it to run fc-cache. If it's not, we run
> fc-cache ourselves.
>
> This is not intended as a workaround. If there's anything else defoma
> wants do
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:27:17AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> I have only a few changes that i am not fully convinced about and that i
> would like to discuss with the team. From debian/changelog:
>
> * If defoma-app and fontconfig's defoma script are available, invoke
> "defoma-
Hi XSF,
it is time to get ready to release -8. I have been working
yesterday reviewing all the svn changes (from 1170 to 1284) that have
been basically done in trunk since -7 was released.
I have only a few changes that i am not fully convinced about and that i
would like to discuss with
10 matches
Mail list logo