Re: Please do not depend on libxaw8-dev.

2006-01-10 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 02:11:28PM -0500, Decklin Foster wrote: > Decklin Foster writes: > > > Not a problem. I thought this was the direction we were going, and it > > was the older versions that would eventually be removed (as with most > > libraries), but I guess I was mistaken. I will prepare

Re: Please do not depend on libxaw8-dev.

2006-01-10 Thread Decklin Foster
Decklin Foster writes: > Not a problem. I thought this was the direction we were going, and it > was the older versions that would eventually be removed (as with most > libraries), but I guess I was mistaken. I will prepare a couple of new > uploads. I note that the following packages depend on l

Re: Please do not depend on libxaw8-dev.

2006-01-10 Thread Decklin Foster
David Martínez Moreno writes: > Please, Decklin, could you point what do you find in libxaw8 that you > have not got in libxaw7? As far as I can tell, libxaw8 differs from > libxaw7 in the print code, which is actually disabled. > > X Strike Force' plans are, among others, drop libxaw8 packages i

Re: Please do not depend on libxaw8-dev.

2006-01-10 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:58:24PM +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > reopen 321664 > thanks for the fish > > Hello, Decklin and Francesco. I have noticed your changelog about this > bug > during a routine upgrade in my system. I send this mail as a member of the X > Strike Force. > >

Please do not depend on libxaw8-dev.

2006-01-10 Thread David Martínez Moreno
reopen 321664 thanks for the fish Hello, Decklin and Francesco. I have noticed your changelog about this bug during a routine upgrade in my system. I send this mail as a member of the X Strike Force. Please, Decklin, could you point what do you find in libxaw8 that you have n