On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 01:54:55PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Already been submitted, and it's blocking on someone from Sun who,
> > AFAICT, hasn't meaningfully existed in any X.Org sense for years now.
> Eeeew. What is this Sun guy complaining about? Can't the curre
Daniel Stone wrote:
>Again, you seem to be excluding the possibility of further development
>happening in xfree86 that didn't happen to get synced.
Yes.
(1) I didn't look at xfree86 upstream
(2) I didn't check the history of Debian's xfree86 patches back very far.
(3) I made the assumption that th
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:29:01AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> OK, it's another update to TODO. UNfortunately, the locales patch seems
> to have lost a bunch of stuff (with no explanation), and several others
> also need some TLC, so this patch makes TODO blow up a bit. *sigh* Maybe
> I oug
OK, it's another update to TODO. UNfortunately, the locales patch seems
to have lost a bunch of stuff (with no explanation), and several others
also need some TLC, so this patch makes TODO blow up a bit. *sigh* Maybe
I ought to split it into several TODOs.
--- TODO2005-06-08 00:26:24.1
4 matches
Mail list logo
