On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:49:11PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm a little frustrated with the rash of FTBFSes and other problems
> (like the reopening of #215831) that I can't detect on my PowerPC,
> because they occur in code architecture-specific to i386 or SPARC.
>
> I am c
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:59:34PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:49:11PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'm a little frustrated with the rash of FTBFSes and other problems
> > (like the reopening of #215831) that I can't detect on my PowerPC,
> > because they occur in
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:49:11PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I'm a little frustrated with the rash of FTBFSes and other problems
> (like the reopening of #215831) that I can't detect on my PowerPC,
> because they occur in code architecture-specific to i386 or SPARC.
>
> I am consequently be
Hi guys,
I'm a little frustrated with the rash of FTBFSes and other problems
(like the reopening of #215831) that I can't detect on my PowerPC,
because they occur in code architecture-specific to i386 or SPARC.
I am consequently beginning to see the wisdom in doing what many other
projects (other
4 matches
Mail list logo