Re: PROPOSAL: re-create branches/4.3.0/sid; release off branch instead of trunk

2004-03-10 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:49:11PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm a little frustrated with the rash of FTBFSes and other problems > (like the reopening of #215831) that I can't detect on my PowerPC, > because they occur in code architecture-specific to i386 or SPARC. > > I am c

Re: PROPOSAL: re-create branches/4.3.0/sid; release off branch instead of trunk

2004-03-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:59:34PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:49:11PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I'm a little frustrated with the rash of FTBFSes and other problems > > (like the reopening of #215831) that I can't detect on my PowerPC, > > because they occur in

Re: PROPOSAL: re-create branches/4.3.0/sid; release off branch instead of trunk

2004-03-09 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:49:11PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I'm a little frustrated with the rash of FTBFSes and other problems > (like the reopening of #215831) that I can't detect on my PowerPC, > because they occur in code architecture-specific to i386 or SPARC. > > I am consequently be

PROPOSAL: re-create branches/4.3.0/sid; release off branch instead of trunk

2004-03-09 Thread Branden Robinson
Hi guys, I'm a little frustrated with the rash of FTBFSes and other problems (like the reopening of #215831) that I can't detect on my PowerPC, because they occur in code architecture-specific to i386 or SPARC. I am consequently beginning to see the wisdom in doing what many other projects (other